*       cleared, we know that we're not executing inline any more
     * </ul>
     *
     * All the states where thread != currentThread are identical for our purposes, and so even
     * though it's racy, we don't care which of those values we get, so no need to synchronize.
     */
    @LazyInit @Nullable Thread thread;

    /** Only used by the thread associated with this object */

  /**
   * This test is for a case where two Service.Listener callbacks for the same service would call
   * transitionService in the wrong order due to a race. Due to the fact that it is a race this test
   * isn't guaranteed to expose the issue, but it is at least likely to become flaky if the race
   * sneaks back in, and in this case flaky means something is definitely wrong.
   *

Estos códigos de estado tienen un nombre asociado para reconocerlos, pero la parte importante es el número.

En breve:

* `100 - 199` son para "Información". Rara vez los usas directamente. Los responses con estos códigos de estado no pueden tener un body.
* **`200 - 299`** son para responses "Exitosos". Estos son los que usarías más.

   * onto the 1/rate (i.e. intervals) that is effective at the given storedPermits. "storedPermits"
   * essentially measure unused time; we spend unused time buying/storing permits. Rate is
   * "permits / time", thus "1 / rate = time / permits". Thus, "1/rate" (time / permits) times
   * "permits" gives time, i.e., integrals on this function (which is what storedPermitsToWaitTime()

 *
 * It is possible to cancel the finding process by canceling its call.
 *
 * Implementations of this interface are not thread-safe. Each instance is thread-confined to the
 * thread executing the call.
 */
interface RoutePlanner {
  val address: Address

  /** Follow-ups for failed plans and plans that lost a race. */
  val deferredPlans: ArrayDeque<Plan>

   * we change the rate.
   */
  public void testWeNeverGetABurstMoreThanOneSec() {
    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(1.0, stopwatch);
    int[] rates = {1000, 1, 10, 1000000, 10, 1};
    for (int rate : rates) {
      int oneSecWorthOfWork = rate;
      stopwatch.sleepMillis(rate * 1000);
      limiter.setRate(rate);

   * we change the rate.
   */
  public void testWeNeverGetABurstMoreThanOneSec() {
    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(1.0, stopwatch);
    int[] rates = {1000, 1, 10, 1000000, 10, 1};
    for (int rate : rates) {
      int oneSecWorthOfWork = rate;
      stopwatch.sleepMillis(rate * 1000);
      limiter.setRate(rate);

 * Prefer to alternate IP addresses from different address families, (IPv6 / IPv4), starting with IPv6.
 * Don't start a new attempt until 250 ms after the most recent attempt was started.
 * Keep whichever TCP connection succeeds first and cancel all the others.
 * Race TCP only. Only attempt a TLS handshake on the winning TCP connection.

Dennoch können wir das zu erwartende Schema für den Requestbody deklarieren.

### Benutzerdefinierter OpenAPI-Content-Type { #custom-openapi-content-type }

 * The performance of these calls on the underlying network. If the network’s performance isn’t sufficient, you need to either improve the network or use less of it.

### EventListener