*/
  private static long fullFingerprint(byte[] bytes, int offset, int length) {
    // For lengths over 64 bytes we hash the end first, and then as we
    // loop we keep 56 bytes of state: v, w, x, y, and z.
    long x = load64(bytes, offset);
    long y = load64(bytes, offset + length - 16) ^ K1;
    long z = load64(bytes, offset + length - 56) ^ K0;
    long[] v = new long[2];

        if (sneaky == null) {
          return sample;
        } else {
          /* Someone beat us to it! Trying again...
           *
           * Technically this loop not guaranteed to terminate, so theoretically (extremely
           * unlikely) this thread might starve, but even then, there is always going to be another
           * thread doing progress here.
           */
        }

 * {@link EndpointPair} of an undirected edge is an unordered pair of nodes ({@link #nodeU()} and
 * {@link #nodeV()}).
 *
 * <p>The edge is a self-loop if, and only if, the two endpoints are equal.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @since 20.0
 */
@Beta
@Immutable(containerOf = {"N"})
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher
    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually
    // probably provide a stronger order guarantee, though that order would obviously be different
    // in some cases.

    /** Global event queue. */

        assertThat(UnsignedInts.parseUnsignedInt(Long.toString(a, radix), radix))
            .isEqualTo((int) a);
      }
    }
  }

  public void testParseIntWithRadixLimits() {
    // loops through all legal radix values.
    for (int r = Character.MIN_RADIX; r <= Character.MAX_RADIX; r++) {
      final int radix = r;
      // tests can successfully parse a number string with this radix.

      // Note that if all the futures on the list are done prior to completing this loop, the last
      // call to addListener() will callback to setOneValue(), transitively call our cleanup
      // listener, and set this.futures to null.
      // This is not actually a problem, since the foreach only needs this.futures to be non-null
      // at the beginning of the loop.
      int i = 0;

#    -X prop       set non-standard JAVA system property
#   --prop=val
#   --prop val     set fess property (i.e.  -Des.<prop>=<val>)

CDPATH=""
SCRIPT="$0"

# SCRIPT may be an arbitrarily deep series of symlinks. Loop until we have the concrete path.
while [ -h "$SCRIPT" ] ; do
  ls=`ls -ld "$SCRIPT"`
  # Drop everything prior to ->
  link=`expr "$ls" : '.*-> \(.*\)$'`
  if expr "$link" : '/.*' > /dev/null; then
    SCRIPT="$link"

  protected void startUp() throws Exception {}

  /**
   * Run the service. This method is invoked on the execution thread. Implementations must respond
   * to stop requests. You could poll for lifecycle changes in a work loop:
   *
   * <pre>
   *   public void run() {
   *     while ({@link #isRunning()}) {
   *       // perform a unit of work
   *     }
   *   }
   * </pre>
   *

        .hasMessageThat()
        .isEqualTo("I bet you didn't think Thread.interrupt could throw");
    // We need to wait for the runner to exit.  It used to be that the runner would get stuck in the
    // busy loop when interrupt threw.
    runner.join(SECONDS.toMillis(10));
  }

  static final class BrokenChannel extends AbstractInterruptibleChannel {
    @Override
    protected void implCloseChannel() {

  TensorHandlePtr combined_value = CreatePerDeviceValues(
      context.get(), in_components, device_name, status.get());
  ASSERT_TRUE(TF_GetCode(status.get()) == TF_OK) << TF_Message(status.get());

  // Loop to make synchronization failures more deterministic
  for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {
    TensorHandlePtr multiply_result(
        Multiply(context.get(), combined_value.get(), combined_value.get(),