reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Floats.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(float[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * ForwardingNavigableMap#descendingMap} to forward to this implementation or a subclass thereof.
   *
   * <p>In particular, this map iterates over entries with repeated calls to {@link
   * NavigableMap#lowerEntry}. If a more efficient means of iteration is available, you may wish to
   * override the {@code entryIterator()} method of this class.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  protected class StandardDescendingMap extends Maps.DescendingMap<K, V> {

   * ForwardingNavigableMap#descendingMap} to forward to this implementation or a subclass thereof.
   *
   * <p>In particular, this map iterates over entries with repeated calls to {@link
   * NavigableMap#lowerEntry}. If a more efficient means of iteration is available, you may wish to
   * override the {@code entryIterator()} method of this class.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  protected class StandardDescendingMap extends Maps.DescendingMap<K, V> {

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

                }
            }
            return buf.toString();
        }
    }

    public ArtifactVersion matchVersion(List<ArtifactVersion> versions) {
        // TODO could be more efficient by sorting the list and then moving along the restrictions in order?

        ArtifactVersion matched = null;
        for (ArtifactVersion version : versions) {
            if (containsVersion(version)) {

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Longs.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(long[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *