* are running concurrently.
   *
   * <p>{@linkplain Executor#execute executed} tasks have a happens-before order as defined in the
   * Java Language Specification. Tasks execute with the same happens-before order that the function
   * calls to {@link Executor#execute execute()} that submitted those tasks had.
   *

	// If we have have any records left, return these before any error.
	for len(r.current) <= r.recordsRead {
		if r.err != nil {
			return nil, r.err
		}
		// Move to next block
		item, ok := <-r.queue
		if !ok {
			r.err = io.EOF
			return nil, r.err
		}
		//nolint:staticcheck // SA6002 Using pointer would allocate more since we would have to copy slice header before taking a pointer.
		r.kvDstPool.Put(r.current)

color:#28a745}.custom-control-input.is-valid~.custom-control-label::before,.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid~.custom-control-label::before{border-color:#28a745}.custom-control-input.is-valid:checked~.custom-control-label::before,.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid:checked~.custom-control-label::before{border-color:#34ce57;background-color:#34ce57}.custom-control-input.is-valid:focus~.custom-control-label::before,.was-validated .custom-control-input:valid:focus~.custom-control-lab...

			driveState = madmin.DriveStateMissing
		default:
			// all remaining cases imply corrupt data/metadata
			driveState = madmin.DriveStateCorrupt
		}

		result.Before.Drives = append(result.Before.Drives, madmin.HealDriveInfo{
			UUID:     "",
			Endpoint: storageEndpoints[i].String(),
			State:    driveState,
		})
		result.After.Drives = append(result.After.Drives, madmin.HealDriveInfo{

		if item.Policy == nil {
			err = globalSiteReplicationSys.PeerBucketPolicyHandler(ctx, item.Bucket, nil, item.UpdatedAt)
		} else {
			bktPolicy, berr := policy.ParseBucketPolicyConfig(bytes.NewReader(item.Policy), item.Bucket)
			if berr != nil {
				writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, toAdminAPIErr(ctx, berr), r.URL)
				return
			}
			if bktPolicy.IsEmpty() {

        original_route_handler = super().get_route_handler()

        async def custom_route_handler(request: Request) -> Response:
            before = time.time()
            response: Response = await original_route_handler(request)
            duration = time.time() - before
            response.headers["X-Response-Time"] = str(duration)
            print(f"route duration: {duration}")
            print(f"route response: {response}")

As said in the section [Alternatives](alternatives.md){.internal-link target=_blank}:

<blockquote markdown="1">

**FastAPI** wouldn't exist if not for the previous work of others.

There have been many tools created before that have helped inspire its creation.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.

for publication.

This document outlines getting in new features after a new branch has been cut and the process for getting a PR
merged in before and after the first public release.

# Feature Freeze

One week before a release, the release branch goes into a state of code freeze. At this point only critical release

    * So, the **certificate and encryption** handling is done **before HTTP**.
* **TCP doesn't know about "domains"**. Only about IP addresses.
    * The information about the **specific domain** requested goes in the **HTTP data**.
* The **HTTPS certificates** "certify" a **certain domain**, but the protocol and encryption happen at the TCP level, **before knowing** which domain is being dealt with.

Das wollen wir besser machen: Laden wir das Modell, bevor die Requests bearbeitet werden, aber unmittelbar bevor die Anwendung beginnt, Requests zu empfangen, und nicht, während der Code geladen wird.

## Lifespan