*
 * <p>We can't use {@code PartiallyGwtIncompatible} because then the GWT compiler wouldn't recognize
 * it as a {@code GwtIncompatible} annotation. And for {@code Futures.catching}, we need the GWT
 * compiler to autostrip the normal server method in order to expose the special, inherited GWT
 * version.
 */
@GwtCompatible
final class Partially {
  /**
   * The presence of this annotation on an API indicates that the method <i>may</i> be used with the

        // Test default max reading num
        assertEquals(10, converter.getMaxReadingNum());
    }

    @Test
    public void testInitNormal() throws IOException {
        // Test normal initialization
        converter.init();
        assertTrue(testConverter.isInitialized());
    }

    @Test
    public void testInitMultipleTimes() throws IOException {
        // Test multiple initialization calls

		ACB_PWNOTREQ               = 0x00000004, /* 1 = User password not required */
		ACB_TEMPDUP                = 0x00000008, /* 1 = Temporary duplicate account */
		ACB_NORMAL                 = 0x00000010, /* 1 = Normal user account */
		ACB_MNS                    = 0x00000020, /* 1 = MNS logon user account */
		ACB_DOMTRUST               = 0x00000040, /* 1 = Interdomain trust account */

# GraphQL { #graphql }

As **FastAPI** is based on the **ASGI** standard, it's very easy to integrate any **GraphQL** library also compatible with ASGI.

You can combine normal FastAPI *path operations* with GraphQL on the same application.

/// tip

**GraphQL** solves some very specific use cases.

It has **advantages** and **disadvantages** when compared to common **web APIs**.

 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could
 * support even a "normal" `TypeParameter<T>` when `<T>` has a nullable bound. (See the discussion
 * on TypeToken.where.) So, in the interest of failing fast and encouraging the user to switch to a

package jcifs.smb1.smb1;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link FileEntry}. The interface itself has no
 * implementation, so the tests exercise the contract via Mockito mocks.
 * Each method is exercised for normal inputs, extreme or edge cases, and
 * interaction verification.
 */
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertNull;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.mock;

Isso significa que no lugar do processo normal de seus usuários enviarem requisições para a sua API, é a **sua API** (ou sua aplicação) que poderia **enviar requisições para o sistema deles** (para a API deles, a aplicação deles).

Isso normalmente é chamado de **webhook**.

    private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(WitnessClient.class);

    // Polling and backoff constants (in ms)
    private static final long MAX_POLL_INTERVAL = 5000; // Normal polling: max 5 seconds
    private static final long MAX_ERROR_BACKOFF = 30000; // Error polling: max 30 seconds
    private static final long BASE_POLL_INTERVAL = 1000;
    private static final long BASE_ERROR_DELAY = 1000;

     *
     * @throws Exception
     */
    @Test
    public void testReadBytes_NormalFile() throws Exception {
        final File normalFile = tempFolder.newFile("normal.txt");
        final String content = "Test content for normal file";

        try (FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(normalFile)) {
            fos.write(content.getBytes("UTF-8"));
        }

Obwohl jeder andere normal deklarierte Parameter (z. B. der Body, mit einem Pydantic-Modell) dennoch validiert, konvertiert, annotiert, usw. werden würde.

Es gibt jedoch bestimmte Fälle, in denen es nützlich ist, auf das `Request`-Objekt zuzugreifen.