import jcifs.smb.SmbException;

@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class LsaPolicyHandleTest {

    @Mock
    private DcerpcHandle mockDcerpcHandle;

    // Mocking MsrpcLsarOpenPolicy2 and MsrpcLsarClose is tricky because they are created inside the constructor/method.
    // We need to use ArgumentCaptor or a custom Answer to control their behavior.
    // For now, let's assume we can mock their behavior through the sendrecv method of DcerpcHandle.

              @Override
              public V setValue(V value) {
                /*
                 * The cast is safe because of the containsKey check above. (Well, it's possible for
                 * the map to change between that call and this one. But if that happens, the
                 * behavior is undefined because of the concurrent mutation.)
                 *

   * the discussion in the {@link ListenableFuture#addListener ListenableFuture.addListener}
   * documentation.
   */
  public void add(Runnable runnable, Executor executor) {
    // Fail fast on a null. We throw NPE here because the contract of Executor states that it throws
    // NPE on null listener, so we propagate that contract up into the add method as well.
    checkNotNull(runnable, "Runnable was null.");

 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,

 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code
 *       ImmutableList.get} returns {@code E}, but that value is never {@code null}. (Accordingly,

   * proxy server can issue an auth challenge and then close the connection.
   *
   * @return the next plan to attempt, or null if no further attempt should be made either because
   *     we've successfully connected or because no further attempts should be made.
   */
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  internal fun connectTunnel(): ConnectResult {
    val nextTunnelRequest =
      createTunnel()

      return;
    }

    /*
     * Any of the setException() calls below can fail if the output Future is cancelled between now
     * and then. This means that we're silently swallowing an exception -- maybe even an Error. But
     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the

      closeLater(ErrorCode.CANCEL)
      connection.sendDegradedPingLater()
    }

    override fun newTimeoutException(cause: IOException?): IOException =
      SocketTimeoutException("timeout").apply {
        if (cause != null) {
          initCause(cause)
        }
      }

    @Throws(IOException::class)
    fun exitAndThrowIfTimedOut() {
      if (exit()) throw newTimeoutException(null)

   * the discussion in the {@link ListenableFuture#addListener ListenableFuture.addListener}
   * documentation.
   */
  public void add(Runnable runnable, Executor executor) {
    // Fail fast on a null. We throw NPE here because the contract of Executor states that it throws
    // NPE on null listener, so we propagate that contract up into the add method as well.
    checkNotNull(runnable, "Runnable was null.");

# Extra Models { #extra-models }

Continuing with the previous example, it will be common to have more than one related model.

This is especially the case for user models, because:

* The **input model** needs to be able to have a password.
* The **output model** should not have a password.
* The **database model** would probably need to have a hashed password.

/// danger