* within VarHandleAtomicHelper and AtomicReferenceFieldUpdaterAtomicHelper.
   *
   * Package-private "shouldn't" be necessary: The *AtomicHelper classes and AbstractFutureState
   * "should" be nestmates, so a call to MethodHandles.lookup or
   * AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater.newUpdater inside *AtomicHelper "should" have access to

Pero cuando importas `Query`, `Path`, `Depends`, `Security` y otros de `fastapi`, en realidad son funciones que devuelven clases especiales.

///

## Usar `SecurityScopes` { #use-securityscopes }

Ahora actualiza la dependencia `get_current_user`.

Esta es la que usan las dependencias anteriores.

      } catch (e: IOException) {
        logger.fine("$this connection from ${raw.inetAddress} failed: $e")
      } catch (e: Exception) {
        logger.log(Level.SEVERE, "$this connection from ${raw.inetAddress} crashed", e)
      }
    }
  }

  internal inner class SocketHandler(
    private val connectionIndex: Int,
    private val raw: Socket,
    private val firstExchangePeek: MockResponse,
  ) {

            assertFalse((writeOnly & ACE.FILE_READ_DATA) != 0, "Write should not include FILE_READ_DATA");
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Boundary Conditions and Edge Cases")
    class BoundaryConditionsTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle signed/unsigned integer boundaries")
        void shouldHandleSignedUnsignedBoundaries() {

        defaultSortBuilders = list.toArray(new SortBuilder[list.size()]);
    }

    /**
     * Creates a sort builder for the specified field and order.
     * This method handles special cases for score fields and regular field sorting.
     *
     * @param field the field name to sort by
     * @param order the sort order (ASC or DESC)
     * @return a configured sort builder
     */

 * Verify.verify(bill.status() == Status.UNPAID,
 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems
 * reasonable and it will be fine.
 *
 * <ul>

                 * be cached and cause other types to fail even though they may
                 * not be the authority for the name. For example, if a WINS lookup
                 * for FOO fails and caches unknownAddress for FOO, a subsequent
                 * lookup for FOO using BCAST should not fail because of that
                 * name cached from WINS.
                 *

        Rule matchedRule = ruleManager.getRule(responseData);

        assertNotNull(matchedRule);
        assertEquals("rule2", matchedRule.getRuleId());
    }

    /**
     * Test edge cases for rule ID
     */
    public void test_ruleId_edgeCases() {
        // Very long rule ID
        StringBuilder longId = new StringBuilder();
        for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {

            // When & Then
            assertThrows(CIFSException.class, () -> transportPool.getChallenge(context, address));
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Edge Cases and Error Handling")
    class EdgeCasesTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle null context")
        void testNullContext() {
            // Given

        with warnings.catch_warnings():
            # Pydantic >= 2.12.0 warns about field specific metadata that is unused
            # (e.g. `TypeAdapter(Annotated[int, Field(alias='b')])`). In some cases, we
            # end up building the type adapter from a model field annotation so we
            # need to ignore the warning:
            if shared.PYDANTIC_VERSION_MINOR_TUPLE >= (2, 12):