if (array[i] > max) {
        max = array[i];
      }
    }
    return max;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the value nearest to {@code value} which is within the closed range {@code [min..max]}.
   *
   * <p>If {@code value} is within the range {@code [min..max]}, {@code value} is returned
   * unchanged. If {@code value} is less than {@code min}, {@code min} is returned, and if {@code

And as you can have parallelism and asynchronicity at the same time, you get higher performance than most of the tested NodeJS frameworks and on par with Go, which is a compiled language closer to C <a href="https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r17&hw=ph&test=query&l=zijmkf-1" class="external-link" target="_blank">(all thanks to Starlette)</a>.

### Is concurrency better than parallelism?

// gatherResults will collect all results on the input channel and filter results according
// to the options or to the current bucket ILM expiry rules.
// Caller should close the channel when done.
// The returned function will return the results once there is enough or input is closed,
// or the context is canceled.
func (o *listPathOptions) gatherResults(ctx context.Context, in <-chan metaCacheEntry) func() (metaCacheEntriesSorted, error) {

func (h *Target) Cancel() {
	h.status.Store(statusClosed)
	h.storeCtxCancel()

	// Wait for messages to be sent...
	h.wg.Wait()

	// Set logch to nil and close it.
	// This will block all Send operations,
	// and finish the existing ones.
	// All future ones will be discarded.
	h.logChMu.Lock()
	xioutil.SafeClose(h.logCh)
	h.logCh = nil
	h.logChMu.Unlock()

						return true, nil
					}
					return false, err
				}
				err = d.deserialize(r)
				r.Close()
				return err != nil, nil
			case InsufficientReadQuorum, StorageErr:
				return true, nil
			}
			return false, err
		}
		err = d.deserialize(r)
		r.Close()
		return err != nil, nil
	}

	// Caches are read+written without locks,
	retries := 0
	for retries < 5 {

   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of elements added to the builder.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static <E> Builder<E> builderWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {

      if (array[i] > max) {
        max = array[i];
      }
    }
    return max;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the value nearest to {@code value} which is within the closed range {@code [min..max]}.
   *
   * <p>If {@code value} is within the range {@code [min..max]}, {@code value} is returned
   * unchanged. If {@code value} is less than {@code min}, {@code min} is returned, and if {@code

          range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED,
          range.upperEndpoint(),
          range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    } else if (range.hasLowerBound()) {
      return map.tailMap(range.lowerEndpoint(), range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    } else if (range.hasUpperBound()) {
      return map.headMap(range.upperEndpoint(), range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    }
    return checkNotNull(map);

          range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED,
          range.upperEndpoint(),
          range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    } else if (range.hasLowerBound()) {
      return map.tailMap(range.lowerEndpoint(), range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    } else if (range.hasUpperBound()) {
      return map.headMap(range.upperEndpoint(), range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED);
    }
    return checkNotNull(map);

pkg io, type Closer interface { Close }
pkg io, type Closer interface, Close() error
pkg io, type LimitedReader struct
pkg io, type LimitedReader struct, N int64
pkg io, type LimitedReader struct, R Reader
pkg io, type PipeReader struct
pkg io, type PipeWriter struct
pkg io, type ReadCloser interface { Close, Read }
pkg io, type ReadCloser interface, Close() error