SampleElements<E> samples();

  /**
   * Creates a new container containing the given elements. TODO: would be nice to figure out how to
   * use E... or E[] as a parameter type, but this doesn't seem to work because Java creates an
   * array of the erased type.
   */
  T create(Object... elements);

  /**

# Optional Path parameters are not supported...

     *
     * @param targetClass
     *            Target class
     * @param methodName
     *            Method name
     * @param methodArgClasses
     *            Array of parameter types
     */
    public MethodNotFoundRuntimeException(final Class<?> targetClass, final String methodName, final Class<?>[] methodArgClasses) {

import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;

import jcifs.Configuration;

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link SmbComFindClose2}.
 * The class is intentionally tiny – the tests mainly verify that the
 * parameter word (the session identifier) is written in little‑endian form
 * and that the {@code toString} helper contains the expected values.
 *
 * <p>The tests also exercise edge cases such as negative (wrap‑around) session

///

## Modelos Pydantic para Formulários { #pydantic-models-for-forms }

Você precisa apenas declarar um **modelo Pydantic** com os campos que deseja receber como **campos de formulários**, e então declarar o parâmetro como um `Form`:

{* ../../docs_src/request_form_models/tutorial001_an_py39.py hl[9:11,15] *}

 *       .where(new TypeParameter<T>() {}, elementType);
 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

 * identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a
 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullUnmarked
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
public interface ArtifactFactory extends Service {

    /**
     * Creates an artifact.
     *
     * @param request the request holding artifact creation parameters
     * @return an {@code Artifact}, never {@code null}
     * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code request} is null or {@code request.session} is null or invalid
     */
    @Nonnull

 * This message is used to receive asynchronous notifications from the witness service.
 */
public class WitnessAsyncNotifyMessage extends WitnessRpcMessage {

    // Input parameters for WitnessAsyncNotify
    private byte[] contextHandle;

    // Output parameters for WitnessAsyncNotify
    private List<WitnessNotificationResponse> notifications;

    /**
     * Creates a new WitnessAsyncNotify RPC message.
     */

                        },
                    },
                    "get": {
                        "summary": "Read Heroes",
                        "operationId": "read_heroes_heroes__get",
                        "parameters": [
                            {
                                "name": "offset",
                                "in": "query",
                                "required": False,