// have been resolved.
        if (request.isResolveRoot()) {
            // Add the root artifact (as the first artifact to retain logical order of class path!)
            Set<Artifact> allArtifacts = new LinkedHashSet<>();
            allArtifacts.add(rootArtifact);
            allArtifacts.addAll(result.getArtifacts());
            result.setArtifacts(allArtifacts);

        out.println("<b><a class=\"plain\" href=\".\">normal</a> | <a class=\"plain\" href=\"?fmt=detail\">detailed</a></b>");
        out.println("<p><table border='0' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td>");

        out.print("<A style=\"width: " + maxLen);
        out.print("; height: 18;\" HREF=\"");
        out.print(path);
        out.println("\"><b>&uarr;</b></a>");

   * if occurrences == 0. This satisfies both NullPointerTester and
   * CollectionRemoveTester.testRemove_nullAllowed, but it's not clear that it's
   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */

        }
    }
    
    // Fall back to TCP
    return new SmbTransport(context, address.getAddress(), address.getPort());
}

private RdmaProvider selectRdmaProvider() {
    // Try providers in order of preference
    List<RdmaProvider> providers = Arrays.asList(
        new DisniRdmaProvider(),      // InfiniBand/RoCE
        new JxioRdmaProvider(),       // Alternative RDMA library

   * * If the proxy selector returns only [Proxy.NO_PROXY].
   * * If the proxy selector returns an empty list or null.
   *
   * Otherwise it lists the proxies in the order they will be attempted.
   *
   * @param url a URL with only the scheme, hostname, and port specified.
   */
  open fun proxySelectEnd(
    call: Call,
    url: HttpUrl,

                    "modules",
                    InputLocation.merge(target.getLocation("modules"), source.getLocation("modules"), indices));
        }
    }

    /*
     * TODO: The order of the merged list could be controlled by an attribute in the model association: target-first,
     * source-first, dominant-first, recessive-first
     */
    @Override
    protected void mergeModelBase_Repositories(

            } else if (!failedProjects.isEmpty()) {
                List<MavenProject> sortedProjects = result.getTopologicallySortedProjects();

                // Sort the failedProjects list in the topologically sorted order.
                failedProjects.sort(comparing(sortedProjects::indexOf));

                MavenProject firstFailedProject = failedProjects.get(0);
                if (!firstFailedProject.equals(sortedProjects.get(0))) {

## Changes since v1.3.0-beta.1

### Experimental Features

* Init containers enable pod authors to perform tasks before their normal containers start. Each init container is started in order, and failing containers will prevent the application from starting. ([#23666](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/23666), [@smarterclayton](https://github.com/smarterclayton))

### Other notable changes

			t.Fatalf("Should have index on %s", "CompanyI.")
		}

		if !m.HasIndex(&DynamicUser{}, "DeletedAt") {
			t.Fatalf("Should have index on deleted_at.")
		}
	}
}

// check column order after migration, flaky test
// https://github.com/go-gorm/gorm/issues/4351
func TestMigrateColumnOrder(t *testing.T) {
	type UserMigrateColumn struct {
		ID uint
	}
	DB.Migrator().DropTable(&UserMigrateColumn{})

   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,