}
                                ),
                                "examples": {
                                    "normal": {
                                        "summary": "A normal example",
                                        "description": "A **normal** item works correctly.",
                                        "value": {
                                            "name": "Foo",

      description: Please describe the issue you encountered.
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: Example
      description: >
        Please provide a [Short, Self Contained, Correct (Compilable), Example](http://sscce.org/)
        demonstrating the bug.
      render: java
    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    attributes:

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

45 bytes received in 00:00 (3.55 KiB/s)
...
```


Following example shows connecting via sftp client using `minioadmin` credentials, and list a bucket named `runner`:

```
sftp -P 8022 minioadmin@localhost
minioadmin@localhost's password:
Connected to localhost.
sftp> ls runner/
chunkdocs  testdir
```

Following example shows how to download an object locally via `sftp` client:

```

//
// The value is useful to stop processing early or when it is necessary to
// deliver a final empty token (which is different from a nil token).
// One could achieve the same behavior with a custom error value but
// providing one here is tidier.
// See the emptyFinalToken example for a use of this value.
var ErrFinalToken = errors.New("final token")

// Scan advances the [Scanner] to the next token, which will then be