@LazyInit private transient @Nullable Ordering<@Nullable Comparable<?>> nullsLast;

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // TODO(kevinb): the right way to explain this??
  public int compare(Comparable<?> left, Comparable<?> right) {
    checkNotNull(left); // for GWT
    checkNotNull(right);
    return ((Comparable<Object>) left).compareTo(right);
  }

  @Override

    }

    @Override
    public Iterable<Entry<String, Integer>> order(List<Entry<String, Integer>> insertionOrder) {
      return new Ordering<Entry<String, Integer>>() {
        @Override
        public int compare(Entry<String, Integer> left, Entry<String, Integer> right) {
          return left.getKey().compareTo(right.getKey());
        }
      }.sortedCopy(insertionOrder);
    }

    @Override

import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Random;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Benchmarks to compare performance of MinMaxPriorityQueue and PriorityQueue.
 *
 * @author Sverre Sundsdal
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class MinMaxPriorityQueueBenchmark {
  @Param private ComparatorType comparator;

     * Returns {@code true} if the specified object is equal to this request.
     * Two requests are considered equal if they have the same type and all
     * significant fields are equal.
     *
     * @param obj the object to compare with this request
     * @return {@code true} if the objects are equal, {@code false} otherwise
     */
    @Override
    boolean equals(Object obj);

    /**

- github.com/spf13/cobra: [v1.8.1 → v1.9.1](https://github.com/spf13/cobra/compare/v1.8.1...v1.9.1)
- github.com/spf13/pflag: [v1.0.5 → v1.0.6](https://github.com/spf13/pflag/compare/v1.0.5...v1.0.6)
- github.com/vishvananda/netlink: [62fb240 → v1.3.1](https://github.com/vishvananda/netlink/compare/62fb240...v1.3.1)
- github.com/vishvananda/netns: [v0.0.4 → v0.0.5](https://github.com/vishvananda/netns/compare/v0.0.4...v0.0.5)

        Map<String, PluginUpgradeInfo> upgrades = new HashMap<>();
        upgrades.put(
                DEFAULT_MAVEN_PLUGIN_GROUP_ID + ":maven-compiler-plugin",
                new PluginUpgradeInfo(DEFAULT_MAVEN_PLUGIN_GROUP_ID, "maven-compiler-plugin", "3.2"));
        upgrades.put(
                "org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin",

But here's the key point.

The security and dependency injection stuff is written once.

And you can make it as complex as you want. And still, have it written only once, in a single place. With all the flexibility.

But you can have thousands of endpoints (*path operations*) using the same security system.

Так за минуты или часы они смогут угадать правильные имя пользователя и пароль — с «помощью» нашего приложения — используя лишь время, затраченное на ответ.

#### Исправление с помощью `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

Но в нашем коде мы используем `secrets.compare_digest()`.

Вкратце: сравнение `stanleyjobsox` с `stanleyjobson` займёт столько же времени, сколько и сравнение `johndoe` с `stanleyjobson`. То же относится и к паролю.

		<osgi.pkg.version>${parsedVersion.majorVersion}.${parsedVersion.minorVersion}.${parsedVersion.incrementalVersion}</osgi.pkg.version>
	</properties>
	<build>
		<plugins>
			<plugin>
				<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
				<version>3.14.0</version>
				<configuration>
					<source>17</source>
					<target>17</target>
					<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
				</configuration>
			</plugin>
			<plugin>

        req.addFlags0(0x10);
        int flags0 = (int) getPrivateField(req, "flags0");
        assertTrue((flags0 & 0x10) != 0, "flag should be set after addFlags0");
        // Calling again should combine rather than overwrite
        req.addFlags0(0x20);
        flags0 = (int) getPrivateField(req, "flags0");
        assertTrue((flags0 & 0x20) != 0, "flag should accumulate");
    }

    @Test