* lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [(short) 1] < [(short) 1, (short) 2] < [(short) 2]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(short[],
   * short[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<short[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

      return Objects.hashCode(name, parameterTypes);
    }

    @Override
    public boolean equals(@CheckForNull Object o) {
      if (o instanceof MethodIdentifier) {
        MethodIdentifier ident = (MethodIdentifier) o;
        return name.equals(ident.name) && parameterTypes.equals(ident.parameterTypes);
      }
      return false;
    }
  }

            String anchor = h23element.attr("id");
            if(!name.startsWith("Table") && tag.equals("h2")){
                toc.append("<li class=\"mainTopic\"><a/></li>").children().last().select("a").first().text(name).attr("href", "#" + anchor);
            } else if(!name.startsWith("Table") && tag.equals("h3")){

                    queryList.addAll(getTermQueryList(q, fields));
                } else if (q instanceof final TermQuery termQuery) {
                    for (final String field : fields) {
                        if (field.equals(termQuery.getTerm().field())) {
                            queryList.add(termQuery);
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
            return queryList;
        }

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */
  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;

   *
   * <p>Even if the input range is empty, if it is connected on both sides by ranges mapped to the
   * same value those two ranges will be coalesced.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> coalescing requires calling {@code .equals()} on any connected values, which
   * may be expensive depending on the value type. Using this method on range maps with large values
   * such as {@link Collection} types is discouraged.
   *
   * @since 22.0
   */

        final String field = getSearchField(context.getDefaultField(), prefixQuery.getField());
        final String text = prefixQuery.getPrefix().text();

        if (Constants.DEFAULT_FIELD.equals(field)) {
            context.addFieldLog(field, text + "*");
            context.addHighlightedQuery(text);
            return buildDefaultQueryBuilder(fessConfig, context,

        Set<Plugin> plugins;

        // NOTE: The upper-case packaging name is intentional, that's a special hinting mode used for certain tests
        if ("JAR".equals(packaging)) {
            plugins = new LinkedHashSet<>();

            plugins.add(newPlugin("maven-compiler-plugin", "compile", "testCompile"));

                // treeConnect good enough to test service type
                connect0();
                if( share.equals( "IPC$" )) {
                    type = TYPE_NAMED_PIPE;
                } else if( tree.service.equals( "LPT1:" )) {
                    type = TYPE_PRINTER;
                } else if( tree.service.equals( "COMM" )) {
                    type = TYPE_COMM;
                } else {