public void testLazyStackTraceWorksInProd() {
    // TODO(b/64442212): Remove this guard once lazyStackTrace() works in Java 9+.
    Integer javaVersion = Ints.tryParse(JAVA_SPECIFICATION_VERSION.value());
    if (javaVersion != null && javaVersion >= 9) {
      return;
    }
    // Obviously this isn't guaranteed in every environment, but it works well enough for now:
    assertTrue(lazyStackTraceIsLazy());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible

                "0 */15 * * * ?", // Every 15 minutes
                "0 0 12 * * ?", // Daily at noon
                "0 15 10 ? * MON-FRI" // Weekdays at 10:15
        };

        // Test each pattern and see what actually works
        for (String cron : potentiallyValidCrons) {
            boolean result = validator.isValid(cron, context);
            // Don't assert true/false here, just test that method doesn't throw

        dstIndex += 2;

        /* windows98 has what appears to be another 4 0's followed by the share
         * name as a zero terminated ascii string "\TMP" + '\0'
         *
         * As is this works, but it deviates from the spec section 4.1.6.6 but
         * maybe I should put it in. Wonder what NT does?
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }

    @Override

 * {@link ValueGraph}, and {@link Network}):
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * someGraphAlgorithm(startNode, graph);
 * }
 *
 * This works because those types each implement {@code SuccessorsFunction}. It will also work with
 * any other implementation of this interface.
 *
 * <p>If you have your own graph implementation based around a custom node type {@code MyNode},

        dstIndex += 2;

        /*
         * windows98 has what appears to be another 4 0's followed by the share
         * name as a zero terminated ascii string "\TMP" + '\0'
         *
         * As is this works, but it deviates from the spec section 4.1.6.6 but
         * maybe I should put it in. Wonder what NT does?
         */

        return dstIndex - start;
    }

    /**
     * @param il
     * @return

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
import org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Tag
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test

/**
 * Integration test to confirm that [TaskRunner] works with a real backend. Business logic is all
 * exercised by [TaskRunnerTest].
 *
 * This test is doing real sleeping with tolerances of 250 ms. Hopefully that's enough for even the
 * busiest of CI servers.
 */

   *
   * @param pattern the pattern on which to filter file names
   */
  public PatternFilenameFilter(Pattern pattern) {
    this.pattern = Preconditions.checkNotNull(pattern);
  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I

import java.util.List;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester to make sure the {@code iterator().remove()} implementation of {@code Multiset} works when
 * there are multiple occurrences of elements.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")

    assertThat(escaper.escape("\0\uFFFF")).isEqualTo("\0\uFFFF");
  }

  public void testBuilderRetainsState() {
    // Setting a safe range and unsafe replacement works as expected.
    Escapers.Builder builder = Escapers.builder();
    builder.setSafeRange('a', 'z');
    builder.setUnsafeReplacement("X");

                throw new RuntimeException(e);
            }
        }, "Multiple close operations should not cause issues");

        // Verify iterator still works after multiple closes
        assertFalse(emptyIterator.hasNext(), "Iterator should still work after multiple closes");
        assertNull(emptyIterator.next(), "Iterator should still return null after multiple closes");
    }

    @Test