* detailed at {@link ImmutableCollection}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> as with any sorted collection, you are strongly advised not to use a {@link
 * Comparator} or {@link Comparable} type whose comparison behavior is <i>inconsistent with
 * equals</i>. That is, {@code a.compareTo(b)} or {@code comparator.compare(a, b)} should equal zero
 * <i>if and only if</i> {@code a.equals(b)}. If this advice is not followed, the resulting

//   In C++ bool is a keyword while in C99 bool is a macro defined
//   in stdbool.h. It is possible for the two to be inconsistent.
//   For example, neither the C99 nor the C++11 standard force a byte
//   size on the bool type, so the macro defined in stdbool.h could
//   be inconsistent with the bool keyword in C++. Thus, the use
//   of stdbool.h is avoided and unsigned char is used instead.

 * detailed at {@link ImmutableCollection}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> as with any sorted collection, you are strongly advised not to use a {@link
 * Comparator} or {@link Comparable} type whose comparison behavior is <i>inconsistent with
 * equals</i>. That is, {@code a.compareTo(b)} or {@code comparator.compare(a, b)} should equal zero
 * <i>if and only if</i> {@code a.equals(b)}. If this advice is not followed, the resulting

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<long[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<long[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

			metaArr[index].ModTime = modTime
			metaArr[index].VersionID = versionID
			if !metaArr[index].InlineData() {
				// If the data is not inlined, we may end up incorrectly
				// inlining the data here, that leads to an inconsistent
				// situation where some objects are were not inlined
				// were now inlined, make sure to `nil` the Data such
				// that xl.meta is written as expected.
				metaArr[index].Data = nil
			}

	// we pass in disks as is for it to be verified. Once verified
	// the disksWithAllParts() returns the actual disks that can be
	// used here for reconstruction. This is done to ensure that
	// we do not skip drives that have inconsistent metadata to be
	// skipped from purging when they are stale.
	availableDisks, dataErrsByDisk, dataErrsByPart := disksWithAllParts(ctx, onlineDisks, partsMetadata,
		errs, latestMeta, filterDisksByETag, bucket, object, scanMode)

    /**
     * Number of updates that alter the size of the table. This is used during bulk-read methods to
     * make sure they see a consistent snapshot: If modCounts change during a traversal of segments
     * computing size or checking containsValue, then we might have an inconsistent view of state so
     * (usually) must retry.
     */
    int modCount;

    /**

 * detailed at {@link ImmutableCollection}.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> as with any sorted collection, you are strongly advised not to use a {@link
 * Comparator} or {@link Comparable} type whose comparison behavior is <i>inconsistent with
 * equals</i>. That is, {@code a.compareTo(b)} or {@code comparator.compare(a, b)} should equal zero
 * <i>if and only if</i> {@code a.equals(b)}. If this advice is not followed, the resulting

> open connections to the database. This setting is generally NOT recommended as the behavior may be inconsistent during recursive deletes in `namespace` format.