- Some Unformatted - format all and return success.
- Any JBOD inconsistent - return failure
- Some are corrupt (missing format.json) - return failure
- Any unrecognized disks - return failure

Some disks are offline and we have quorum.
-----------------
- Some unformatted - format all and return success,
  treat disks offline as corrupted.
- Any JBOD inconsistent - return failure
- Some are corrupt (missing format.json)

        }

        // Then - no exceptions should have been thrown
        assertTrue(true); // If we reach here, no exceptions occurred
    }

    /**
     * Test consistency across multiple calls
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test consistency across multiple calls")
    public void testConsistencyAcrossMultipleCalls() {
        // Given
        smbComTreeDisconnect = new SmbComTreeDisconnect(config);

        executor.shutdown();

        // Then - Session should be in consistent state
        // The double-check pattern should prevent inconsistent cleanup
        assertTrue(releaseCount.get() > 0 || acquireCount.get() > 0, "Release and acquire counts should be processed");
    }

    /**
     * Test that trees collection is properly cleared during cleanup.

   * common prefix, or when one array is a prefix of the other, treats the shorter array as the
   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [1.0] < [1.0, 2.0] < [2.0]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(double[],
   * double[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */

    void testMultipleEncodeOperations() {
        long endOfFile = 0x1234567890ABCDEFL;
        FileEndOfFileInformation info = new FileEndOfFileInformation(endOfFile);

        // Encode multiple times to verify consistency
        byte[] buffer1 = new byte[8];
        byte[] buffer2 = new byte[8];

        int bytes1 = info.encode(buffer1, 0);
        int bytes2 = info.encode(buffer2, 0);

        assertEquals(8, bytes1);

as a set of individual machine-word-sized operations
in an unspecified order.
This means that races on multiword data structures
can lead to inconsistent values not corresponding to a single write.
When the values depend on the consistency
of internal (pointer, length) or (pointer, type) pairs,
as can be the case for interface values, maps,
slices, and strings in most Go implementations,

       * pass.
       *
       * 2. We would probably choose to compare exceptions using == instead of equals() (for
       * consistency with how weak references are cleared). That's a behavior change -- arguably the
       * removal of a feature.
       *
       * Fortunately, exceptions rarely contain references to expensive resources.
       */

        for (Thread t : threads) {
            t.start();
        }

        // Wait for completion
        for (Thread t : threads) {
            t.join();
        }

        // Verify consistency
        SimpleCircuitBreaker.Statistics stats = breaker.getStatistics();
        assertEquals(successCount.get() + failureCount.get(), stats.totalSuccesses + stats.totalFailures + stats.rejectedCalls);
    }

    @Test

            // Both non-null - should be same instance
            assertSame(first, second, "Second getSubject should return same cached instance as first");
        } else {
            fail("Inconsistent behavior: first=" + first + ", second=" + second);
        }

        // Third call should return the same cached Subject instance
        Subject third = auth.getSubject();

        long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
        // UTime is seconds since epoch, so divide by 1000
        long unixTime = time / 1000L;

        // Mocking date for timezone consistency
        TimeZone original = TimeZone.getDefault();
        try {
            TimeZone.setDefault(TimeZone.getTimeZone("UTC"));
            ServerMessageBlock.writeUTime(unixTime * 1000L, buffer, 0);