}
        /* TODO should throw this immediately, but need artifact
                else
                {
                    throw new OverConstrainedVersionException( "Restricting incompatible version ranges" );
                }
        */

        return new VersionRange(version, restrictions);
    }

    private List<Restriction> intersection(List<Restriction> r1, List<Restriction> r2) {

    assertFalse(set.contains(""));
    assertFalse(set.contains("california"));
    assertFalse(set.contains(null));
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("CollectionIncompatibleType") // testing incompatible types
  public void testExplicit_containsMismatchedTypes() {
    SortedSet<String> set =
        ImmutableSortedSet.orderedBy(STRING_LENGTH)
            .add("in", "the", "quick", "jumped", "over", "a")

        checkArgument(
            fromUpperBounds.length == toUpperBounds.length
                && fromLowerBounds.length == toLowerBounds.length,
            "Incompatible type: %s vs. %s",
            fromWildcardType,
            to);
        for (int i = 0; i < fromUpperBounds.length; i++) {
          populateTypeMappings(mappings, fromUpperBounds[i], toUpperBounds[i]);
        }

- github.com/distribution/reference: [v0.5.0 → v0.6.0](https://github.com/distribution/reference/compare/v0.5.0...v0.6.0)
- github.com/docker/docker: [v20.10.27+incompatible → v26.1.4+incompatible](https://github.com/docker/docker/compare/v20.10.27...v26.1.4)
- github.com/docker/go-connections: [v0.4.0 → v0.5.0](https://github.com/docker/go-connections/compare/v0.4.0...v0.5.0)

 * object.
 *
 * <p><b>Comparison to {@code java.util.Optional} (JDK 8 and higher):</b> A new {@code Optional}
 * class was added for Java 8. The two classes are extremely similar, but incompatible (they cannot
 * share a common supertype). <i>All</i> known differences are listed either here or with the
 * relevant methods below.
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>This class is serializable; {@code java.util.Optional} is not.

   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>We could change the serialization of this class incompatibly. We have reserved the right
   *       to make such changes to our serialized forms, and we have made them before, usually
   *       without trouble. In this case, my guess is that our chosen approach is even less likely
   *       to lead to trouble than an incompatible change would be.

            assertSame(referralData, unwrapped);
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should throw ClassCastException for incompatible type")
        void testUnwrapToIncompatibleType() {
            // Create a mock class that extends DfsReferralData but is not compatible
            class IncompatibleReferralData implements DfsReferralData {
                @Override

## Dependencies

### Added
_Nothing has changed._

### Changed
- github.com/evanphx/json-patch: [v5.6.0+incompatible → v4.12.0+incompatible](https://github.com/evanphx/json-patch/compare/v5.6.0...v4.12.0)
- github.com/google/cel-go: [v0.16.0 → v0.16.1](https://github.com/google/cel-go/compare/v0.16.0...v0.16.1)

### Removed

   * the cache, but only the "generic" one is type-safe. That is, it will properly prevent you from
   * building caches whose key or value types are incompatible with the types accepted by the
   * weigher already provided; the {@code CacheBuilder} type cannot do this. For best results,
   * simply use the standard method-chaining idiom, as illustrated in the documentation at top,

    NullPointerTester tester = new NullPointerTester();
    tester.setDefault(int.class, 1);
    tester.testAllPublicStaticMethods(IntMath.class);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // isPrime is GWT-incompatible
  public void testIsPrime() {
    // Defer correctness tests to Long.isPrime

    // Check the first 100,000 integers
    for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {