* the `APIRouter`
* the `requirements.txt`
* the Bearer Token
* the breaking change
* the bug
* the button
* the callable
* the code
* the commit
* the context manager
* the coroutine
* the database session
* the disk
* the domain
* the engine
* the fake X
* the HTTP GET method
* the item
* the library
* the lifespan
* the lock
* the middleware

import contextlib
import email.message
import functools
import inspect
import json
import types
from collections.abc import (
    AsyncIterator,
    Awaitable,
    Callable,
    Collection,
    Coroutine,
    Generator,
    Iterator,
    Mapping,
    Sequence,
)
from contextlib import (
    AbstractAsyncContextManager,
    AbstractContextManager,
    AsyncExitStack,
    asynccontextmanager,
)

	// passed on, the hanging adb subprocess will hold them open and
	// go test will hang forever.
	//
	// Avoid that by wrapping stderr, breaking the short circuit and
	// forcing cmd.Run to use another pipe and goroutine to pass
	// along stderr from adb.
	cmd.Stderr = struct{ io.Writer }{os.Stderr}
	err := cmd.Run()

	// Before we process err, flush any further output and get the exit code.
	exitCode, err2 := filter.Finish()

* le `APIRouter`
* le `requirements.txt`
* le jeton Bearer
* le changement majeur incompatible
* le bogue
* le bouton
* l’appelable
* le code
* le commit
* le gestionnaire de contexte
* la coroutine
* la session de base de données
* le disque
* le domaine
* le moteur
* le faux X
* la méthode HTTP GET
* l’élément
* la bibliothèque
* le cycle de vie
* le verrou
* le middleware

<p>
The function value and parameters are
<a href="#Calls">evaluated as usual</a>
in the calling goroutine, but
unlike with a regular call, program execution does not wait
for the invoked function to complete.
Instead, the function begins executing independently
in a new goroutine.
When the function terminates, its goroutine also terminates.
If the function has any return values, they are discarded when the
function completes.

* SDK
* software development kit

* `APIRouter`
* `requirements.txt`
* Bearer Token
* breaking change
* bug
* button
* callable
* code
* commit
* context manager
* coroutine
* database session
* disk
* domain
* engine
* fake X
* HTTP GET method
* item
* library
* lifespan
* lock
* middleware
* mobile application
* module
* mounting
* network

</p>

<h3 id="arm">ARM</h3>

<p>
The registers <code>R10</code> and <code>R11</code>
are reserved by the compiler and linker.
</p>

<p>
<code>R10</code> points to the <code>g</code> (goroutine) structure.
Within assembler source code, this pointer must be referred to as <code>g</code>;
the name <code>R10</code> is not recognized.
</p>

<p>

	}

	if h.clientToken == bgHealingUUID {
		// For background heal do nothing, do not spawn an unnecessary goroutine.
	} else {
		// Launch top-level background heal go-routine
		go h.healSequenceStart(objAPI)
	}

	b, err := json.Marshal(madmin.HealStartSuccess{
		ClientToken:   clientToken,

// Cancellation/timeouts are removed, so parent cancellations/timeout will
// not propagate from parent.
// Context values are preserved.
// This can be used for goroutines that live beyond the parent context.
func bgContext(parent context.Context) context.Context {
	return bgCtx{parent: parent}
}

type bgCtx struct {
	parent context.Context
}

Але всю цю функціональність використання асинхронного коду з `async` і `await` часто підсумовують як використання «співпрограм». Це порівняно з головною ключовою особливістю Go - «Goroutines».

## Висновок { #conclusion }

Погляньмо на ту саму фразу ще раз:

> Сучасні версії Python мають підтримку «асинхронного коду» за допомогою так званих «співпрограм», з синтаксисом **`async` і `await`**.