* this class rather than implement {@link Network} directly.
 *
 * <p>The methods implemented in this class should not be overridden unless the subclass admits a
 * more efficient implementation.
 *
 * @author James Sexton
 * @param <N> Node parameter type
 * @param <E> Edge parameter type
 * @since 20.0
 */
@Beta
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

   * removeAll}{@code (occurrencesToRemove)}, which removes all occurrences of elements that appear
   * in {@code occurrencesToRemove}. However, this operation <i>is</i> equivalent to, albeit
   * sometimes more efficient than, the following:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * for (E e : occurrencesToRemove) {
   *   multisetToModify.remove(e);
   * }
   * }</pre>
   *

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Ints.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(int[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

   * removeAll}{@code (occurrencesToRemove)}, which removes all occurrences of elements that appear
   * in {@code occurrencesToRemove}. However, this operation <i>is</i> equivalent to, albeit
   * sometimes more efficient than, the following:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * for (E e : occurrencesToRemove) {
   *   multisetToModify.remove(e);
   * }
   * }</pre>
   *

   * InputStream#skip(long) skip}, if possible) to the end of the stream and return the total number
   * of bytes that were read.
   *
   * <p>Note that for some sources that implement {@link #sizeIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of bytes
   * than would be returned by reading all of the bytes (for example, some special files may return

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Chars.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(char[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

   * approximate size of HTTP/2 headers before they are compressed with HPACK. This value is
   * intended to be used as a metric: smaller headers are more efficient to encode and transmit.
   */
  fun byteCount(): Long {
    // Each header name has 2 bytes of overhead for ': ' and every header value has 2 bytes of
    // overhead for '\r\n'.

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Floats.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(float[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**

    reverse(array, fromIndex, toIndex);
  }

  /**
   * Reverses the elements of {@code array}. This is equivalent to {@code
   * Collections.reverse(Doubles.asList(array))}, but is likely to be more efficient.
   *
   * @since 23.1
   */
  public static void reverse(double[] array) {
    checkNotNull(array);
    reverse(array, 0, array.length);
  }

  /**