import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.AggregateFuture.ReleaseResourcesReason.OUTPUT_FUTURE_DONE;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Uninterruptibles.getUninterruptibly;
import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;
import static java.util.logging.Level.SEVERE;

 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;

 *
 * The last point is subtle. Often the observable object will be managing its own internal state
 * using a lock, however it is dangerous to dispatch listeners while holding a lock because they
 * might run on the {@code directExecutor()} or be otherwise re-entrant (call back into your
 * object). So it is important to not call {@link #dispatch} while holding any locks. This is why

    f.addListener(() -> ranImmediately.set(true), directExecutor());
    assertThat(ranImmediately.get()).isTrue();
    t.interrupt();
    t.join();
  }

  public void testCatchesUndeclaredThrowableFromListener() {
    AbstractFuture<String> f = new AbstractFuture<String>() {};
    f.set("foo");
    f.addListener(() -> sneakyThrow(new SomeCheckedException()), directExecutor());
  }

import static com.google.common.base.Predicates.not;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Internal.toNanosSaturated;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Service.State.FAILED;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Service.State.NEW;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Service.State.RUNNING;

    } finally {
      function = null;
    }

    /*
     * If set()/setValue() throws an Error, we let it propagate. Why? The most likely Error is a
     * StackOverflowError (from deep transform(..., directExecutor()) nesting), and calling
     * setException(stackOverflowError) would fail:
     *
     * - If the stack overflowed before set()/setValue() could even store the result in the output

import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.immediateFailedFuture;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.immediateFuture;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.shutdownAndAwaitTermination;

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.getOnlyElement;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.invokeAnyImpl;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator;

import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.immediateFailedFuture;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures.immediateFuture;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator;
import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.shutdownAndAwaitTermination;

   * @param executor the executor in which the listeners callback methods will be run. For fast,
   *     lightweight listeners that would be safe to execute in any thread, consider {@link
   *     MoreExecutors#directExecutor}.
   * @since 13.0
   */
  void addListener(Listener listener, Executor executor);

  /**
   * The lifecycle states of a service.
   *