for (int i = 0, n = origStackTrace.length; i < n; i++) {
        if (WithExplicitOrdering.class.getName().equals(origStackTrace[i].getClassName())) {
          // For pre-populated disallowedPriorLocks edges, omit the stack trace.
          setStackTrace(EMPTY_STACK_TRACE);
          break;
        }
        if (!EXCLUDED_CLASS_NAMES.contains(origStackTrace[i].getClassName())) {

   * Ordering.from(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER).onResultOf(Functions.toStringFunction())
   * }
   *
   * <p><b>Java 8+ users:</b> Use {@code Comparator.comparing(function, thisComparator)} instead
   * (you can omit the comparator if it is the natural order).
   */
  public <F extends @Nullable Object> Ordering<F> onResultOf(Function<F, ? extends T> function) {
    return new ByFunctionOrdering<>(function, this);
  }

   *
   * <p>That iterator supports {@code remove()} if {@code iterable.iterator()} does. After {@code
   * remove()} is called, subsequent cycles omit the removed element, which is no longer in {@code
   * iterable}. The iterator's {@code hasNext()} method returns {@code true} until {@code iterable}
   * is empty.
   *

       2. However, you should still add Javadoc if there are caveats around
          calling a method that are not immediately obvious from reading the
          method's implementation in isolation.
       3. You can omit Javadoc for simple classes, e.g. where they are a
          simple container for some data. However, please consider whether a
          reader might still benefit from some additional background, for

 *  New: `Request.Builder.cacheUrlOverride()` customizes the cache key used for a request. This can
    be used to make canonical URLs for the cache that omit insignificant query parameters or other
    irrelevant data.

    This feature may be used with `POST` requests to cache their responses. In such cases the

common:linux_arm64_pycpp_test_filters --test_lang_filters=cc,py --test_size_filters=small,medium --flaky_test_attempts=3
# TODO(michaelhudgins): Why do we need to specifically omit go and java here?

	}

	AssertAssociationCount(t, user2, "Account", 0, "after clear")
}

func TestHasOneAssociationWithSelect(t *testing.T) {
	user := *GetUser("hasone", Config{Account: true})

	DB.Omit("Account.Number").Create(&user)

	AssertAssociationCount(t, user, "Account", 1, "")

	var account Account
	DB.Model(&user).Association("Account").Find(&account)
	if account.Number != "" {

	CheckUser(t, user2, user)
}

func TestOmitWithCreate(t *testing.T) {
	user := *GetUser("omit_create", Config{Account: true, Pets: 3, Toys: 3, Company: true, Manager: true, Team: 3, Languages: 3, Friends: 4})
	DB.Omit("Account", "Toys", "Manager", "Birthday").Create(&user)

	var result User

   * java.util.stream.Stream#filter}. This method is not being deprecated, but we gently encourage
   * you to migrate to streams.
   */
  // TODO(kevinb): how to omit that last sentence when building GWT javadoc?
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> Set<E> filter(
      Set<E> unfiltered, Predicate<? super E> predicate) {
    if (unfiltered instanceof SortedSet) {

		}
	}

	associationDB := association.DB.Session(&Session{}).Model(nil)
	if !association.DB.FullSaveAssociations {
		associationDB.Select(selectedSaveColumns)
	}
	if len(omitColumns) > 0 {
		associationDB.Omit(omitColumns...)
	}
	associationDB = associationDB.Session(&Session{})

	switch reflectValue.Kind() {
	case reflect.Slice, reflect.Array:
		if len(values) != reflectValue.Len() {
			// clear old data