* (if applicable). This process will essentially remove duplicate repositories by merging them into one equivalent
     * repository. It is worth to point out that merging does not simply choose one of the input repositories and
     * discards the others but actually combines their possibly different policies.
     *

	recursive    bool       `msg:"rec"`
	dataVersion  uint8      `msg:"v"`
}

func (m *metacache) finished() bool {
	return !m.ended.IsZero()
}

// worthKeeping indicates if the cache by itself is worth keeping.
func (m *metacache) worthKeeping() bool {
	if m == nil {
		return false
	}
	cache := m
	switch {
	case !cache.finished() && time.Since(cache.lastUpdate) > metacacheMaxRunningAge:

	// Test on a copy
	// cleanup is the only one deleting caches.
	caches, _ := b.cloneCaches()

	for id, cache := range caches {
		if !cache.worthKeeping() {
			b.debugf("cache %s not worth keeping", id)
			remove[id] = struct{}{}
			continue
		}
		if cache.id != id {
			logger.Info("cache ID mismatch %s != %s", id, cache.id)
			remove[id] = struct{}{}
			continue
		}

 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and

 * could in principle cause problems for some users. Still, we expect that the benefits of the
 * nullness annotations in particular will outweigh the costs. (And it's worth noting that we have
 * released multiple ListenableFuture.class files that are not byte-for-byte compatible even from
 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and

Plus jamais vous ne vous tromperez en tapant le nom d'une clé, vous ne ferez des aller-retour entre votre code et la documentation ou vous ne scrollerez de haut en bas afin d'enfin savoir si vous devez taper `username` ou `user_name`.

### Court

Des **valeurs par défaut** sont définies pour tout, des configurations optionnelles sont présentent partout. Tous ces paramètres peuvent être ajustés afin de faire ce que vous voulez et définir l'API dont vous avez besoin.

 * if any intersection is found. The sizes of both arguments are assumed to be so small, and the
 * likelihood of an intersection so great, that it is not worth the CPU cost of sorting or the
 * memory cost of hashing.
 */
internal fun Array<String>.hasIntersection(
  other: Array<String>?,
  comparator: Comparator<in String>,
): Boolean {

   * @param args the arguments to be substituted into the message template. The first argument
   *     specified is substituted for the first occurrence of {@code "%s"} in the template, and so
   *     forth. A {@code null} argument is converted to the four-character string {@code "null"};
   *     non-null values are converted to strings using {@link Object#toString()}.
   * @since 25.1
   */

You will get completion in code you might even consider impossible before. As for example, the `price` key inside a JSON body (that could have been nested) that comes from a request.

No more typing the wrong key names, coming back and forth between docs, or scrolling up and down to find if you finally used `username` or `user_name`.

### Short { #short }

      return build(/* throwIfDuplicateKeys= */ true);
    }

    public ImmutableMap<K, V> buildKeepingLast() {
      if (valueComparator != null) {
        // Probably not worth supporting this in GWT
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
            "orderEntriesByValue + buildKeepingLast not supported under GWT");
      }
      return build(/* throwIfDuplicateKeys= */ false);
    }