assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  public void testReverseIndexed() {
    testReverse(new float[] {}, 0, 0, new float[] {});
    testReverse(new float[] {1}, 0, 1, new float[] {1});
    testReverse(new float[] {1, 2}, 0, 2, new float[] {2, 1});
    testReverse(new float[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 2, new float[] {1, 3, 1});
    testReverse(new float[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 1, new float[] {3, 1, 1});

    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  public void testReverseIndexed() {
    testReverse(new long[] {}, 0, 0, new long[] {});
    testReverse(new long[] {1}, 0, 1, new long[] {1});
    testReverse(new long[] {1, 2}, 0, 2, new long[] {2, 1});
    testReverse(new long[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 2, new long[] {1, 3, 1});
    testReverse(new long[] {3, 1, 1}, 0, 1, new long[] {3, 1, 1});

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

		}

		// release data to pool
		field.NewValuePool.Put(values[idx])
	}
}

// ScanMode scan data mode
type ScanMode uint8

// scan modes
const (
	ScanInitialized         ScanMode = 1 << 0 // 1
	ScanUpdate              ScanMode = 1 << 1 // 2
	ScanOnConflictDoNothing ScanMode = 1 << 2 // 4
)

// Scan scan rows into db statement
func Scan(rows Rows, db *DB, mode ScanMode) {
	var (

    return true
  }

  @Throws(IOException::class)
  internal fun checkUpgradeSuccess(
    response: Response,
    exchange: Exchange?,
  ) {
    if (response.code != 101) {
      throw ProtocolException(
        "Expected HTTP 101 response but was '${response.code} ${response.message}'",
      )
    }

    val headerConnection = response.header("Connection")

    - [Client Binaries](#client-binaries-11)
    - [Server Binaries](#server-binaries-11)
    - [Node Binaries](#node-binaries-11)
  - [Changelog since v1.10.1](#changelog-since-v1101)
    - [Other notable changes](#other-notable-changes-11)
- [v1.10.1](#v1101)
  - [Downloads for v1.10.1](#downloads-for-v1101)
    - [Client Binaries](#client-binaries-12)
    - [Server Binaries](#server-binaries-12)
    - [Node Binaries](#node-binaries-12)

 *   </li>
 * <li>a hyphen usually precedes a qualifier, and is always less important than digits/number, for example
 *   {@code 1.0.RC2 < 1.0-RC3 < 1.0.1}; but prefer {@code 1.0.0-RC1} over {@code 1.0.0.RC1}, and more
 *   generally: {@code 1.0.X2 < 1.0-X3 < 1.0.1} for any string {@code X}; but prefer {@code 1.0.0-X1}
 *   over {@code 1.0.0.X1}.</li>
 * </ul>
 *

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

 * the beginning, thanks to using different `-source -target` values for compiling our `-jre` and
 * `-android` "flavors.")
 *
 * (We could consider releasing a listenablefuture:1.0.1 someday. But we would want to look into how
 * that affects users, especially users of the Android Gradle Plugin, since the plugin developers
 * put in a special hack for us: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/131431257)
 */

    assertThat(input).isEqualTo(expectedOutput);
  }

  public void testSortDescendingIndexed() {
    testSortDescending(new int[] {}, 0, 0, new int[] {});
    testSortDescending(new int[] {1}, 0, 1, new int[] {1});
    testSortDescending(new int[] {1, 2}, 0, 2, new int[] {2, 1});
    testSortDescending(new int[] {1, 3, 1}, 0, 2, new int[] {3, 1, 1});
    testSortDescending(new int[] {1, 3, 1}, 0, 1, new int[] {1, 3, 1});