* Si on compare Uvicorn, il faut le comparer à d'autres serveurs d'applications comme Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc.
* **Starlette** :
    * A les secondes meilleures performances après Uvicorn. En réalité, Starlette utilise Uvicorn. De ce fait, il ne peut qu’être plus « lent » qu'Uvicorn car il requiert l'exécution de plus de code.

Et aussi après que la `response` a été générée, avant de la renvoyer.

Par exemple, vous pourriez ajouter un en-tête personnalisé `X-Process-Time` contenant le temps en secondes nécessaire pour traiter la requête et générer une réponse :

{* ../../docs_src/middleware/tutorial001_py310.py hl[10,12:13] *}

/// tip | Astuce

    }

    /**
     * Calculate total throughput in MB/s based on total time
     *
     * @param totalTimeSeconds total elapsed time in seconds
     * @return throughput in MB/s
     */
    public double getThroughputMBps(double totalTimeSeconds) {
        if (totalTimeSeconds <= 0.0) {
            return 0.0;
        }

import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static java.lang.Thread.currentThread;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;

import static com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors.directExecutor;
import static java.lang.Thread.currentThread;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;

    get() {
      if (executorServiceOrNull == null) {
        executorServiceOrNull =
          ThreadPoolExecutor(
            0,
            Int.MAX_VALUE,
            60,
            TimeUnit.SECONDS,
            SynchronousQueue(),
            threadFactory("$okHttpName Dispatcher", false),
          )
      }
      return executorServiceOrNull!!
    }

    /* Should recover to be able to remove() after next(). */
    assertEquals("B", peekingIterator.next());
    peekingIterator.remove();
    assertEquals("Should have removed an element", 2, list.size());
    assertFalse("Second element should be gone", list.contains("B"));
  }

  static class ThrowsAtEndException extends RuntimeException {
    /* nothing */
  }

  /**

   * that of {@code ((Byte) a).compareTo(b)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method behaves identically to {@link Byte#compare}.
   *
   * @param a the first {@code byte} to compare
   * @param b the second {@code byte} to compare
   * @return a negative value if {@code a} is less than {@code b}; a positive value if {@code a} is
   *     greater than {@code b}; or zero if they are equal
   */

            // Performance assertion - should complete within reasonable time
            long duration = endTime - startTime;
            assertTrue(duration < 1000, "UpgradeResult creation should complete within 1 second for 1000 POMs");

            // Verify correctness
            assertTrue(result.success(), "Result should be successful");

		t.Errorf("Should find correct value for embedded pointer type")
	}

	if hnPost.Author != nil {
		t.Errorf("Expected to get back a nil Author but got: %v", hnPost.Author)
	}

	now := time.Now().Round(time.Second)
	NewPost := HNPost{
		BasePost: &BasePost{Title: "embedded_pointer_type2"},
		Author: &Author{
			Name:        "test",
			Content:     Content{"test"},
			ContentPtr:  nil,
			Birthday:    now,