* utility methods, or {@link ListenableFutureTask}. Those APIs have less opportunity for developer
 * error. If your needs are more complex than {@code SettableFuture} supports, use {@link
 * AbstractFuture}, which offers an extensible version of the API.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @since 9.0 (in 1.0 as {@code ValueFuture})
 */
@GwtCompatible

import java.util.Properties;

import org.apache.maven.api.Constants;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Centralized class for Maven Core feature information.
 * Features configured are supposed to be final in a given maven session.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
public final class Features {

    private Features() {}

    /**
     * Check if the personality is "maven3".
     */

  }

  @Override
  protected Collection<Method> suppressForConcurrentHashMap() {
    /*
     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *

   * @deprecated Unsupported operation.
   */
  @Deprecated
  @Override
  @DoNotCall("Always throws UnsupportedOperationException")
  public void remove(Range<C> range) {
    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Guaranteed to throw an exception and leave the {@code RangeSet} unmodified.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated Unsupported operation.
   */

            return new byte[0];
        }
        try {
            return str.getBytes(config.getOemEncoding());
        } catch (final UnsupportedEncodingException e) {
            throw new RuntimeCIFSException("Unsupported OEM encoding " + config.getOemEncoding(), e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Decodes a string from UTF-16LE (Unicode Little Endian) bytes.
     *

	// The ZIP format has a sad state of affairs regarding character encoding.
	// Officially, the name and comment fields are supposed to be encoded
	// in CP-437 (which is mostly compatible with ASCII), unless the UTF-8
	// flag bit is set. However, there are several problems:
	//
	//	* Many ZIP readers still do not support UTF-8.
	//	* If the UTF-8 flag is cleared, several readers simply interpret the

	callbackTypeAfterDelete  callbackType = "AfterDelete"
	callbackTypeAfterFind    callbackType = "AfterFind"
)

// ErrUnsupportedDataType unsupported data type
var ErrUnsupportedDataType = errors.New("unsupported data type")

type Schema struct {
	Name                      string
	ModelType                 reflect.Type
	Table                     string
	PrioritizedPrimaryField   *Field

Args = -H:+AddAllCharsets --enable-http --enable-https --features=okhttp3.internal.graal.OkHttpFeature --report-unsupported-elements-at-runtime...

   * with the entries {@code (3, 5] => "foo", (6, 8) => "bar", (10, 12) => "baz"}.
   *
   * <p>The returned range map supports all optional operations that this range map supports, except
   * for {@code asMapOfRanges().iterator().remove()}.
   *
   * <p>The returned range map will throw an {@link IllegalArgumentException} on an attempt to

			echo "${MINIO_GROUPNAME}:x:1000" >>/etc/group
			chroot --userspec=${MINIO_USERNAME}:${MINIO_GROUPNAME} / "$@"
		fi
	else
		exec "$@"
	fi
}

## DEPRECATED and unsupported - switch to user if applicable.