entries = append(entries, ch)
		}
		out := make(chan metaCacheEntry, 1)
		err := mergeEntryChannels(context.Background(), entries, out, 1)
		if err != nil {
			t.Fatal(err)
		}
		got, ok := <-out
		if !ok {
			t.Fatal("Got no result")
		}

		xl, err := got.xlmeta()
		if err != nil {
			t.Fatal(err)
		}
		if len(xl.versions) != 3 {

     * value in the map is the number of occurrences of the key.
     */
    SortedMap<Integer, AtomicInteger> replica = Maps.newTreeMap();
    assertTrue("Empty heap should be OK", mmHeap.isIntact());
    for (int i = 0; i < heapSize; i++) {
      int randomInt = random.nextInt();
      mmHeap.offer(randomInt);
      insertIntoReplica(replica, randomInt);
    }
    assertIntact(mmHeap);

       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {
      // OK, fine: If it doesn't exist, then there's chance that we're going to be asked to test it.
    }
  }

  /**
   * Sets a default value that can be used for any parameter of type {@code type}. Returns this
   * object.

       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));
    } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {
      // OK, fine: If it doesn't exist, then there's chance that we're going to be asked to test it.
    }
  }

  /**
   * Sets a default value that can be used for any parameter of type {@code type}. Returns this
   * object.

  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html
  // For a (long) discussion about this specific issue and the general futility of life.
  //
  // For the time being we are OK with the problem discussed above since it requires a caller to
  // introduce a very specific kind of data-race. And given the other operations performed by these

         * only way to get a TypeVariable instance for the resolved types is to create our own. The
         * created TypeVariable will not interoperate with any JDK TypeVariable. But this is OK: We
         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new

labels.joblog_button_back=Back
labels.joblog_button_delete=Delete
labels.joblog_configuration=Job Log
labels.joblog_endTime=End Time
labels.joblog_jobName=Name
labels.joblog_jobStatus=Status
labels.joblog_status_ok=Ok
labels.joblog_status_fail=Failed
labels.joblog_status_running=Running
labels.joblog_link_details=Details
labels.joblog_link_list=List
labels.joblog_scriptData=Script
labels.joblog_scriptResult=Result

    /*
     * We always hold the mutex when calling this. TODO(cpovirk): Is that important? Perhaps we need
     * to guarantee that each call to reserveEarliestAvailable, etc. sees a value >= the previous?
     * Also, is it OK that we don't hold the mutex when sleeping?
     */
    protected abstract long readMicros();

    protected abstract void sleepMicrosUninterruptibly(long micros);

        .body("Body")
        .build(),
    )
    newWebSocket()
    clientListener.assertFailure(
      200,
      "Body",
      ProtocolException::class.java,
      "Expected HTTP 101 response but was '200 OK'",
    )
  }

  @Test
  @Throws(IOException::class)
  fun notFound() {
    webServer.enqueue(
      MockResponse.Builder()
        .status("HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found")
        .build(),
    )

    /*
     * We always hold the mutex when calling this. TODO(cpovirk): Is that important? Perhaps we need
     * to guarantee that each call to reserveEarliestAvailable, etc. sees a value >= the previous?
     * Also, is it OK that we don't hold the mutex when sleeping?
     */
    protected abstract long readMicros();

    protected abstract void sleepMicrosUninterruptibly(long micros);