Doing this, our `GzipRequest` will take care of decompressing the data (if necessary) before passing it to our *path operations*.

After that, all of the processing logic is the same.

But because of our changes in `GzipRequest.body`, the request body will be automatically decompressed when it is loaded by **FastAPI** when needed.

</blockquote>

## Recherche

En utilisant toutes les alternatives précédentes, j'ai eu la chance d'apprendre de toutes, de prendre des idées, et de les combiner de la meilleure façon que j'ai pu trouver pour moi-même et les équipes de développeurs avec lesquelles j'ai travaillé.

# ----------------------------------------------------------
# Application Exception
# ---------------------
# /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# five framework-embedded messages (don't change key names)
# - - - - - - - - - -/
errors.login.failure = Logowanie nie powiodło się.
errors.app.illegal.transition = Nieprawidłowe przejście. Spróbuj ponownie.

 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The methods of {@code ForwardingMultiset} forward <b>indiscriminately</b> to
 * the methods of the delegate. For example, overriding {@link #add(Object, int)} alone <b>will
 * not</b> change the behavior of {@link #add(Object)}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In
 * this case, you should override {@code add(Object)} as well, either providing your own

    assertThat(graph.outDegree(N1)).isEqualTo(2);
    putEdge(N2, N1);
    assertThat(graph.outDegree(N1)).isEqualTo(3);
  }

  // Stable order tests

  // Note: Stable order means that the ordering doesn't change between iterations and versions.
  // Ideally, the ordering in test should never be updated.
  @Test
  public void stableIncidentEdgeOrder_edges_returnsInStableOrder() {

  public void testObjectHashCodeWithSameLowOrderBytes() {
    // These will have the same first 4 bytes (all 0).
    byte[] bytesA = new byte[5];
    byte[] bytesB = new byte[5];

    // Change only the last (5th) byte
    bytesA[4] = (byte) 0xbe;
    bytesB[4] = (byte) 0xef;

    HashCode hashCodeA = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesA);
    HashCode hashCodeB = HashCode.fromBytes(bytesB);

import com.google.common.testing.FakeTicker;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests relating to automatic cache refreshing.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheRefreshTest extends TestCase {
  public void testAutoRefresh() {
    FakeTicker ticker = new FakeTicker();
    IncrementingLoader loader = incrementingLoader();

    for (int i = 0, len = charSequence.length(); i < len; i++) {
      putChar(charSequence.charAt(i));
    }
    return this;
  }

  @Override
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public Hasher putString(CharSequence charSequence, Charset charset) {
    return putBytes(charSequence.toString().getBytes(charset));
  }

  @Override
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public Hasher putBytes(byte[] bytes) {

     * The entrySet() of ConcurrentHashMap, unlike that of other Map
     * implementations, supports add() under JDK8. This seems problematic, but I
     * didn't see that discussed in the review, which included many other
     * changes: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-May/thread.html#17367
     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users

# ----------------------------------------------------------
# Application Exception
# ---------------------
# /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
# five framework-embedded messages (don't change key names)
# - - - - - - - - - -/
errors.login.failure = 登录失败。
errors.app.illegal.transition = 非法转换，请重试。
errors.app.db.already.deleted = 可能已被其他进程删除。请重试。
errors.app.db.already.updated = 可能已被其他进程更新。请重试。