boundaryIndex != -1L -> boundaryIndex // We found the boundary.
        source.buffer.size >= toIndex -> minOf(toIndex, maxByteCount) // No boundary before toIndex.
        else -> throw EOFException() // We ran out of data before we found the required boundary.
      }
    }

    @Throws(IOException::class)
    override fun close() {
      if (closed) return
      closed = true
      currentPart = null

      }
      socketHost = proxyAddress.socketHost
      socketPort = proxyAddress.port
    }

    if (socketPort !in 1..65535) {
      throw SocketException("No route to $socketHost:$socketPort; port is out of range")
    }

    if (proxy.type() == Proxy.Type.SOCKS) {
      mutableInetSocketAddresses += InetSocketAddress.createUnresolved(socketHost, socketPort)
    } else {
      val addresses =

import okhttp3.internal.http.HTTP_TEMP_REDIRECT
import okhttp3.internal.http.toHttpDateOrNull
import okhttp3.internal.toNonNegativeInt

/**
 * Given a request and cached response, this figures out whether to use the network, the cache, or
 * both.
 *
 * Selecting a cache strategy may add conditions to the request (like the "If-Modified-Since" header

You could use these tools and ideas if you are setting up **your own deployment system** while taking care of the other deployment concepts yourself.

			//
			// So it safe to assume that '100-continue' is what would
			// be sent, for the time being keep this work around.
			// Adding a *TODO* to remove this later when Golang server
			// doesn't filter out the 'Expect' header.
			extractedSignedHeaders.Set(header, "100-continue")
		case "host":
			// Go http server removes "host" from Request.Header
			extractedSignedHeaders.Set(header, r.Host)
		case "transfer-encoding":

---

"_If you're looking to learn one **modern framework** for building REST APIs, check out **FastAPI** [...] It's fast, easy to use and easy to learn [...]_"

"_We've switched over to **FastAPI** for our **APIs** [...] I think you'll like it [...]_"

  }

  /** If we don't keep a strong reference to the reference object, it won't be enqueued. */
  @Nullable FinalizableWeakReference<Object> reference;

  /** Create the FRQ in a method that goes out of scope so that we're sure it will be reclaimed. */
  private void weaklyReferenceQueue() {
    frq = new FinalizableReferenceQueue();
    queueReference = new WeakReference<>(frq.queue);

    /*

  }

  /** If we don't keep a strong reference to the reference object, it won't be enqueued. */
  @Nullable FinalizableWeakReference<Object> reference;

  /** Create the FRQ in a method that goes out of scope so that we're sure it will be reclaimed. */
  private void weaklyReferenceQueue() {
    frq = new FinalizableReferenceQueue();
    queueReference = new WeakReference<>(frq.queue);

    /*

                 * they don't run into this.
                 */

                /* UPDATE: Maybe not! Could this be a Unicode alignment issue. I hope
                 * so. We cannot just comment out this method and use readString of
                 * ServerMessageBlock.java because the arguments are different, however
                 * one might be able to reduce this.
                 */

{* ../../docs_src/websockets/tutorial003_py39.py hl[79:81] *}

To try it out:

* Open the app with several browser tabs.
* Write messages from them.
* Then close one of the tabs.

That will raise the `WebSocketDisconnect` exception, and all the other clients will receive a message like: