* to {@code contains(null)} is permitted to throw a {@code NullPointerException}.
   *
   * @param message message to use upon assertion failure
   */
  protected void expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported(String message) {
    try {
      assertFalse(message, actualContents().contains(null));
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // Tolerated
    }
  }

   * to {@code contains(null)} is permitted to throw a {@code NullPointerException}.
   *
   * @param message message to use upon assertion failure
   */
  protected void expectNullMissingWhenNullUnsupported(String message) {
    try {
      assertFalse(message, actualContents().contains(null));
    } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      // Tolerated
    }
  }

            // Then
            assertNotNull(result);
            assertTrue(result.contains("SmbInfoAllocation"));
            assertTrue(result.contains("alloc=0"));
            assertTrue(result.contains("free=0"));
            assertTrue(result.contains("sectPerAlloc=0"));
            assertTrue(result.contains("bytesPerSect=0"));
        }

        @Test

MinIO needs a persistent volume to store configuration and application data. For testing purposes, you can launch MinIO by simply passing a directory (`/data` in the example below). This directory gets created in the container filesystem at the time of container start. But all the data is lost after container exits.

```sh
docker run \
  -p 9000:9000 \

    * Leaked File descriptors ([#275](https://github.com/docker/containerd/issues/275))
    * Additional memory overhead per container ([#21737](https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/21737))
  * Docker 1.10.3 contains [backports provided by RedHat](https://github.com/docker/docker/compare/v1.10.3...runcom:docker-1.10.3-stable) for known issues
  * Support for Docker version 1.9.x has been removed

        // Verify the exception message indicates name resolution failure
        assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("NONEXISTENT") || exception.getMessage().contains("unknown")
                || exception.getMessage().contains("not found"), "Exception message should indicate name resolution failure");
    }

    @Test

  }

  public void testOverriddenNotAnnotatedInSubclass() {
    assertThat(getSubscriber().overriddenNotAnnotatedInSubclassEvents).contains(EVENT);
  }

  public void testDifferentlyOverriddenNotAnnotatedInSubclass() {
    assertThat(getSubscriber().differentlyOverriddenNotAnnotatedInSubclassGoodEvents)
        .contains(EVENT);

Wenn Sie in hier **mehrere Container** hätten, würde Prometheus beim **Lesen der Metriken** standardmäßig jedes Mal diejenigen für **einen einzelnen Container** abrufen (für den Container, der den spezifischen Request verarbeitet hat), anstatt die **akkumulierten Metriken** für alle replizierten Container abzurufen.

#*      *##set ( $spdx = 'EPL-2.0' )
#*    *##elseif ( $license.url.contains( "www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0" )
                    || $license.url.contains( "https://raw.github.com/hunterhacker/jdom/master/LICENSE.txt" ) )
#*      *##set ( $spdx = 'Apache-2.0' )
#*    *##elseif ( $license.name == "BSD-2-Clause" || $license.name == "The BSD 2-Clause License"
                    || $license.url.contains( "www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license" ) )

        assertThrows(
            IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> networkAsMutableNetwork.addEdge(N4, N5, E12));
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains(ERROR_REUSE_EDGE);
    e = assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> addEdge(N2, N1, E12));
    assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains(ERROR_REUSE_EDGE);
  }

  @Test
  public void addEdge_parallelEdge_notAllowed() {
    assume().that(graphIsMutable()).isTrue();