public void testCompare() {
    for (char x : VALUES) {
      for (char y : VALUES) {
        assertWithMessage(x + ", " + y)
            .that(Math.signum(Chars.compare(x, y)))
            .isEqualTo(Math.signum(Character.compare(x, y)));
      }
    }
  }

  public void testContains() {
    assertThat(Chars.contains(EMPTY, (char) 1)).isFalse();
    assertThat(Chars.contains(ARRAY1, (char) 2)).isFalse();

         * Android), the built-in TypeVariable's equals() method doesn't recognize instances of our
         * TypeVariable implementation. This is a problem because users compare TypeVariables from
         * the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To work with all JDK versions,
         * TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable implementation in each of the three

	}
	// We have checked if prefix matches, so we can do direct compare.
	return b.First > prefix
}

// endedPrefix returns true if the given prefix ends within the block.
func (b metacacheBlock) endedPrefix(prefix string) bool {
	if prefix == "" || strings.HasPrefix(b.Last, prefix) {
		return false
	}

	// We have checked if prefix matches, so we can do direct compare.
	return b.Last > prefix

   * is running when that time is reached, that task is allowed to complete before this task is
   * started. Similarly the task will be delayed if the host lacks compute resources.
   *
   * @throws RejectedExecutionException if the queue is shut down and the task is not cancelable.
   */
  fun schedule(
    task: Task,
    delayNanos: Long = 0L,
  ) {
    taskRunner.withLock {

        Guava's main yardstick for evaluating proposed features can be summed up as [utility times
        ubiquity](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility-times-ubiquity).


        #### Utility: compare with alternatives


        There is always *some* alternative to adding a new feature to Guava, even if it's just
        forking Guava yourself.

## Recap { #recap }

With what you have seen up to now, you can set up a secure **FastAPI** application using standards like OAuth2 and JWT.

In almost any framework handling the security becomes a rather complex subject quite quickly.

			return errFileCorrupt
		}
		return nil
	}

	h := algo.New()
	hashBuf := make([]byte, h.Size())
	left := wantSize

	// Calculate the size of the bitrot file and compare
	// it with the actual file size.
	if left != bitrotShardFileSize(partSize, shardSize, algo) {
		return errFileCorrupt
	}

	bufp := xioutil.ODirectPoolSmall.Get()
	defer xioutil.ODirectPoolSmall.Put(bufp)

 * every module to patch.</p>
 *
 * <p>Path types are often exclusive. For example, a dependency should not be both on the Java class path
 * and on the Java module path.</p>
 *
 * <h2>Relationship with Java compiler standard location</h2>
 * This enumeration is closely related to the {@link JavaFileManager.Location} enumerations.
 * A difference is that the latter enumerates input and output files, while {@code JavaPathType}

    checkState(method == null);
    Method[] methods = getClass().getMethods();
    Arrays.sort(
        methods,
        new Comparator<Method>() {
          @Override
          public int compare(Method a, Method b) {
            return a.getName().compareTo(b.getName());
          }
        });
    for (Method method : methods) {
      if (method.isAnnotationPresent(TestSubtype.class)) {

        assertNotSame(unknownException.getMessageCode(), parseException.getMessageCode());
    }

    public void test_complexMessageCode() {
        // Setup - test with a complex message code that includes parameters
        final String queryString = "field:value AND (";
        final VaMessenger<FessMessages> complexMessageCode =