- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 591 - 600 of 691 for Rights (0.12 sec)
-
android/guava/src/com/google/common/collect/ImmutableList.java
return construct(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6, e7, e8, e9, e10, e11); } // These go up to eleven. After that, you just get the varargs form, and // whatever warnings might come along with it. :( /** * Returns an immutable list containing the given elements, in order. * * <p>The array {@code others} must not be longer than {@code Integer.MAX_VALUE - 12}. *
Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Sep 23 17:50:58 UTC 2025 - 27.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/pom.xml
Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Dec 05 03:10:05 UTC 2025 - 26.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
pom.xml
Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Dec 05 03:10:05 UTC 2025 - 26.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
src/main/java/jcifs/netbios/NameServiceClientImpl.java
} } void tryClose() { synchronized (this.LOCK) { /* * Yes, there is the potential to drop packets * because we might close the socket during a * request. However the chances are slim and the * retry code should ensure the overall request * is serviced. The alternative complicates thingsRegistered: Sat Dec 20 13:44:44 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Sat Aug 30 05:58:03 UTC 2025 - 38.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/AbstractFutureState.java
// then we know it must have given a pending toString value earlier. If not, then the future // completed after the timeout expired, and the message might be success. if (isDone()) { throw new TimeoutException(message + " but future completed as timeout expired"); } throw new TimeoutException(message + " for " + futureToString); }Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Aug 07 16:05:33 UTC 2025 - 33.2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
guava-tests/test/com/google/common/collect/IteratorsTest.java
} public void testMergeSorted_stable_issue5773Example() { ImmutableList<TestDatum> left = ImmutableList.of(new TestDatum("B", 1), new TestDatum("C", 1)); ImmutableList<TestDatum> right = ImmutableList.of(new TestDatum("A", 2), new TestDatum("C", 2)); Comparator<TestDatum> comparator = Comparator.comparing(d -> d.letter);
Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Tue Oct 28 18:44:53 UTC 2025 - 56.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
cmd/data-scanner.go
break } bucket, prefix := path2BucketObject(k) stopFn := globalScannerMetrics.time(scannerMetricCheckMissing) f.updateCurrentPath(k) if bucket != resolver.bucket { // Bucket might be missing as well with abandoned children. // make sure it is created first otherwise healing won't proceed // for objects. bgSeq.queueHealTask(healSource{ bucket: bucket, }, madmin.HealItemBucket)
Registered: Sun Dec 28 19:28:13 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Aug 29 02:39:48 UTC 2025 - 45.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
compat/maven-compat/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/legacy/LegacyRepositorySystem.java
if (layout == null) { layout = new UnknownRepositoryLayout(id, layouts.get("default")); } return layout; } /** * In the future, the legacy system might encounter repository types for which no layout components exists because * the actual communication with the repository happens via a repository connector. As a minimum, the legacy systemRegistered: Sun Dec 28 03:35:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Jun 06 14:28:57 UTC 2025 - 31.2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
compat/maven-compat/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/repository/legacy/resolver/DefaultLegacyArtifactCollector.java
artifact.setDependencyTrail(node.getDependencyTrail()); set.add(node); // This is required right now. result.addArtifact(artifact); } } } catch (OverConstrainedVersionException e) {
Registered: Sun Dec 28 03:35:09 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Fri Jun 06 14:28:57 UTC 2025 - 36.5K bytes - Viewed (0) -
android/guava/src/com/google/common/util/concurrent/Futures.java
ListenableFuture<? extends V>... futures) { /* * Another way to express this signature would be to bound <V> by @NonNull and accept * LF<? extends @Nullable V>. That might be better: There's currently no difference between the * outputs users get when calling this with <Foo> and calling it with <@Nullable Foo>. The only
Registered: Fri Dec 26 12:43:10 UTC 2025 - Last Modified: Thu Aug 07 16:05:33 UTC 2025 - 64.3K bytes - Viewed (0)