if len(results) == 0 {
		t.Fatalf("no record find")
	} else if results[0].Pet.UserID == nil || *(results[0].Pet.UserID) != user.ID {
		t.Fatalf("wrong user id in pet")
	} else if results[0].Pet.Name != user.Pets[0].Name {
		t.Fatalf("wrong pet name")
	}
}

func TestJoinArgsWithDB(t *testing.T) {
	user := *GetUser("joins-args-db", Config{Pets: 2})
	DB.Save(&user)

	// test where

        // Any PACDecodingException is acceptable for this test
        assertNotNull(e.getMessage());
    }

    @Test
    void testInvalidVersion() throws IOException {
        // Create minimal PAC structure with wrong version
        ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
        writeLittleEndianInt(baos, 0); // buffer count = 0
        writeLittleEndianInt(baos, 99); // invalid version

  - The project ID will be auto-generated as `Gradle_MyTestBranch`. If not, you probably selected wrong parent, the "Parent project" should be `Gradle`.
- Now click on the new project you just created. The URL should be `https://builds.gradle.org/admin/editProject.html?projectId=Gradle_<MyTestBranch>`.

     */
    @Override
    public boolean verifySignature(final byte[] buffer, final int i, final int size) {
        // observed too that signatures on error responses are sometimes wrong??
        // Looks like the failure case also is just reflecting back the signature we sent

        // with SMB3's negotiation validation it's no longer possible to ignore this (on the validation response)

 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard
 *       configurations, and there's always the potential that something will go wrong. It
 *       <i>probably</i> won't, since the deps are needed only in tests (and maybe someday in
 *       testlib), but why bother?
 *   <li>Stripping code entirely might help us keep under the method limit someday. Even if it never

	for _, cat := range testcats {
		for _, test := range cat.tests {
			parser.allowABI = cat.allowABI
			parser.errorCount = 0
			parser.lineNum++
			if !parser.pseudo(test.pseudo, tokenize(test.operands)) {
				t.Fatalf("Wrong pseudo-instruction: %s", test.pseudo)
			}
			errorLine := buf.String()
			if test.expected != errorLine {
				t.Errorf("Unexpected error %q; expected %q", errorLine, test.expected)
			}
			buf.Reset()
		}
	}

        String type = "VeryLongTokenTypeNameForTestingPurposes";
        String message =
                "This is a very long error message that describes in detail why the access token is invalid and what went wrong during validation";
        InvalidAccessTokenException exception = new InvalidAccessTokenException(type, message);

        assertEquals(type, exception.getType());
        assertEquals(message, exception.getMessage());

    // TODO: move this to invariant checks once the appropriate hook exists?
    super.expectContents(expected);
    for (Entry<K, V> entry : expected) {
      assertEquals(
          "Wrong value for key " + entry.getKey(), entry.getValue(), getMap().get(entry.getKey()));
    }
  }

  protected final void expectReplacement(Entry<K, V> newEntry) {

			target = &a[2]
			break
		}
		p.errorf("wrong number of arguments to %s instruction", op)
		return
	case 4:
		if p.arch.Family == sys.S390X || p.arch.Family == sys.PPC64 {
			// 4-operand compare-and-branch.
			prog.From = a[0]
			prog.Reg = p.getRegister(prog, op, &a[1])
			prog.AddRestSource(a[2])
			target = &a[3]
			break
		}
		p.errorf("wrong number of arguments to %s instruction", op)
		return

		// Test case with signature part missing.
		{
			authString:    fmt.Sprintf("%s %s", signV2Algorithm, accessID),
			expectedError: ErrMissingFields,
		},
		// Test case - 5.
		// Test case with wrong accessID.
		{
			authString:    fmt.Sprintf("%s %s:%s", signV2Algorithm, "InvalidAccessID", "signature"),
			expectedError: ErrInvalidAccessKeyID,
		},
		// Test case - 6.
		// Case with right accessID and format.