// If the implementation uses identityHashCode(), referential equality is
        // probably intended. So no point in using an equal-but-different factory argument.
        // We check twice to avoid confusion caused by accidental hash collision.
        equalArgs.set(i, shouldBeEqualArg);
      }
    }
    return equalArgs;
  }

  private static boolean hashCodeInsensitiveToArgReference(

   */
  Set<E> outEdges(N node);

  /**
   * Returns the count of {@code node}'s {@link #incidentEdges(Object) incident edges}, counting
   * self-loops twice (equivalently, the number of times an edge touches {@code node}).
   *
   * <p>For directed networks, this is equal to {@code inDegree(node) + outDegree(node)}.
   *

        // If the implementation uses identityHashCode(), referential equality is
        // probably intended. So no point in using an equal-but-different factory argument.
        // We check twice to avoid confusion caused by accidental hash collision.
        equalArgs.set(i, shouldBeEqualArg);
      }
    }
    return equalArgs;
  }

  private static boolean hashCodeInsensitiveToArgReference(

      //    internal char array (hard to avoid using StringBuilder)
      // 2. we avoid extra copies into temporary buffers altogether
      // The downside is that this will cause us to store the file bytes in memory twice for a short
      // amount of time.
      return new String(ByteSource.this.read(), charset);
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {

    // benchmarking shows it can take 7 times longer than the other two in some cases. The other two
    // do n swaps, minus a delta (0 or 2 for Reversal, gcd(d, n) for Successive), so that's about
    // twice as many reads and writes. But benchmarking shows that they usually perform better than
    // Dolphin. Reversal is about as good as Successive on average, and it is much simpler,

     * need to be on the same host. This operation does not copy extended
     * file attributes such as ACLs but it does copy regular attributes as
     * well as create and last write times. This method is almost twice as
     * efficient as manually copying as it employs an additional write
     * thread to read and write data concurrently.
     * <br>
     * It is not possible (nor meaningful) to copy entire workgroups or

then, when you've cleared all the jelly-fish out of the way--'

  `THAT generally takes some time,' interrupted the Gryphon.

  `--you advance twice--'

  `Each with a lobster as a partner!' cried the Gryphon.

  `Of course,' the Mock Turtle said:  `advance twice, set to
partners--'

  `--change lobsters, and retire in same order,' continued the
Gryphon.

calling <code>twoprint</code> will call <code>setup</code> exactly
once.
The <code>setup</code> function will complete before either call
of <code>print</code>.
The result will be that <code>"hello, world"</code> will be printed
twice.
</p>

<h3 id="atomic">Atomic Values</h3>

<p>
The APIs in the <a href="/pkg/sync/atomic/"><code>sync/atomic</code></a>
package are collectively “atomic operations”

        case WILL_CLOSE:
        case CLOSING:
        case CLOSED:
          throw new IllegalStateException("Cannot call finishToFuture() twice");

        case OPEN:
          throw new AssertionError();
      }
    }
    return future;
  }

  /**

			if !errors.Is(err, errErasureWriteQuorum) {
				t.Errorf("Expected putObject to fail with %v, but failed with %v", toObjectErr(errErasureWriteQuorum, bucket, object), err)
			}
		})
	}
}

// Test PutObject twice, one small and another bigger
// than small data threshold and checks reading them again
func TestPutObjectSmallInlineData(t *testing.T) {
	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(t.Context())
	defer cancel()