import time
from collections import Counter
from collections.abc import Container
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Union

import httpx
import yaml
from github import Github
from pydantic import BaseModel, SecretStr
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings

github_graphql_url = "https://api.github.com/graphql"

                .get(stream -> stream.map(String::trim).toArray(n -> new String[n]));
    }

    /**
     * Loads artifacts from a YAML-based repository.
     *
     * @param url the URL of the YAML repository
     * @return a list of artifacts loaded from the repository
     * @throws PluginException if failed to parse the repository content
     */

La manera en que funciona es que escribes la definición del esquema usando el formato YAML dentro del docstring de cada función que maneja una ruta.

Y genera esquemas OpenAPI.

Así es como funciona en Flask, Starlette, Responder, etc.

Pero luego, tenemos otra vez el problema de tener una micro-sintaxis, dentro de un string de Python (un gran YAML).

O jeito como ele funciona é que você escreve a definição do schema usando formato YAML dentro da docstring de cada função que lida com uma rota.

E ele gera schemas OpenAPI.

É assim como funciona no Flask, Starlette, Responder, etc.

Mas então, temos novamente o problema de ter uma micro-sintaxe, dentro de uma string Python (um grande YAML).

Die Funktionsweise besteht darin, dass Sie die Definition des Schemas im YAML-Format im Docstring jeder Funktion schreiben, die eine Route verarbeitet.

Und es generiert OpenAPI-Schemas.

So funktioniert es in Flask, Starlette, Responder, usw.

Aber dann haben wir wieder das Problem einer Mikrosyntax innerhalb eines Python-Strings (eines großen YAML).

The way it works is that you write the definition of the schema using YAML format inside the docstring of each function handling a route.

And it generates OpenAPI schemas.

That's how it works in Flask, Starlette, Responder, etc.

But then, we have again the problem of having a micro-syntax, inside of a Python string (a big YAML).

from http.server import HTTPServer, SimpleHTTPRequestHandler
from multiprocessing import Pool
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any, Optional, Union

import mkdocs.utils
import typer
import yaml
from jinja2 import Template
from ruff.__main__ import find_ruff_bin
from slugify import slugify as py_slugify

logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)

SUPPORTED_LANGS = {
    "en",
    "de",
    "es",

For more details, see the [Installation Guide](https://fess.codelibs.org/15.3/install/index.html).

### Docker

We provide Docker images on [ghcr.io](https://github.com/orgs/codelibs/packages). We also provide a Docker Compose (YAML) file in [this repository](https://github.com/codelibs/docker-fess/tree/master/compose). 

### Browser UI

- Search UI: http://localhost:8080/

![Search UI](https://fess.codelibs.org/_images/fess_search_result1.png)

Le principe est le suivant : vous écrivez la définition du schéma au format YAML dans la docstring de chaque fonction gérant une route.

Et il génère des schémas OpenAPI.

C'est ainsi que cela fonctionne dans Flask, Starlette, Responder, etc.

Mais alors, nous avons à nouveau le problème d'avoir une micro-syntaxe, dans une docstring Python (un gros morceau de YAML).

- github.com/gkampitakis/go-diff: [v1.3.2](https://github.com/gkampitakis/go-diff/tree/v1.3.2)
- github.com/gkampitakis/go-snaps: [v0.5.15](https://github.com/gkampitakis/go-snaps/tree/v0.5.15)
- github.com/goccy/go-yaml: [v1.18.0](https://github.com/goccy/go-yaml/tree/v1.18.0)
- github.com/joshdk/go-junit: [v1.0.0](https://github.com/joshdk/go-junit/tree/v1.0.0)
- github.com/maruel/natural: [v1.1.1](https://github.com/maruel/natural/tree/v1.1.1)