.addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableDoubleArray iia = ImmutableDoubleArray.of(0, 1, 3);

   * pass null inputs to LegacyConverter, and it can violate the contract of Converter.
   *
   * TODO(cpovirk): Could this be simplified if we modified implementations of LegacyConverter to
   * override methods (probably called "unsafeDoForward" and "unsafeDoBackward") with the same
   * signatures as the methods below, rather than overriding the same doForward and doBackward
   * methods as implementations of normal converters do?
   *

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

      Class<?> cls;
      try {
        cls = classInfo.load();
      } catch (NoClassDefFoundError e) {
        // In case there were linking problems, this is probably not a class we care to test anyway.
        logger.log(Level.SEVERE, "Cannot load class " + classInfo + ", skipping...", e);
        continue;
      }
      if (!cls.isInterface()) {
        classes.add(cls);

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableLongArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableLongArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableLongArray iia = ImmutableLongArray.of(0, 1, 3);

            throws SmbException {
        if (host.indexOf('.') < 0 && host.toUpperCase(Locale.ROOT).equals(host)) {
            // this is not too good, probably should better pass the address and check that it is a netbios one.
            // While we could look up the domain controller/KDC we cannot really make the java kerberos implementation
            // use a KDC of our choice.

        if (result < 0) {
          // Overflow (or one or more sources that returned a negative size, but all bets are off in
          // that case)
          // Can't represent anything higher, and realistically there probably isn't anything that
          // can actually be done anyway with the supposed 8+ exbibytes of data the source is
          // claiming to have if we get here, so just stop.
          return Optional.of(Long.MAX_VALUE);

  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcatOverflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {