- Kube-apiserver: Made the subresources `pods/exec`, `pods/attach`, and `pods/portforward` require `create` permission for both SPDY and Websocket API requests. Previously, SPDY requests required `create` permission, but Websocket requests only required `get` permission. This change is gated by the `Authoriz...

  /**
   * This is invoked for the last bytes of the input, which are not enough to fill a whole chunk.
   * The passed {@code ByteBuffer} is guaranteed to be non-empty.
   *
   * <p>This implementation simply pads with zeros and delegates to {@link #process(ByteBuffer)}.
   */
  protected void processRemaining(ByteBuffer bb) {
    Java8Compatibility.position(bb, bb.limit()); // move at the end

* Improve efficiency of preemption logic in clusters with many pending pods. ([#72895](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/72895), [@bsalamat](https://github.com/bsalamat))
* Fix scheduling starvation of pods in cluster with large number of unschedulable pods. ([#72619](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/72619), [@everpeace](https://github.com/everpeace))

  Similarly you can also access  kubelet's `/pods` endpoint to fetch a list of Pods bound to that node by granting the caller `nodes/pods` permission in RBAC.
  Similarly you can also access kubelet's `/configz` endpoint to fetch kubelet's configuration by granting the caller `nodes/configz` permission in RBAC.

 * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA  02111-1307  USA
 */

package jcifs.spnego;

/**
 * Constants for SPNEGO authentication mechanism OIDs used in GSS-API negotiations
 */
public interface SpnegoConstants {

    /**
     * OID for the SPNEGO mechanism
     */
    String SPNEGO_MECHANISM = "1.3.6.1.5.5.2";

    /**

consequence of this change the Kubelet now correctly takes into account the resources of running and terminating pods when deciding to accept new pods, since terminating pods are still holding on to those resources. This stricter handling may surface to end users as pod rejections when creating pods that are scheduled to mostly full nodes that have other terminating pods holding the resources the new pods need. The most likely error would be a pod set to `Failed` phase with reason set to `OutOfCpu` or `OutOfMemory`,...

        CertificatePinner.Pin("example.com", certA1Sha256Pin),
        CertificatePinner.Pin("www.example.com", certA1Sha256Pin),
      )
    assertEquals(expectedPins, builder.pins)
    assertEquals(HashSet(expectedPins), certificatePinner.pins)
  }

  companion object {
    val certA1 =
      HeldCertificate
        .Builder()
        .serialNumber(100L)
        .build()

			}
		}

		if found != nil && found.ETag != "" && partMetaQuorumMap[maxETag] >= readQuorum {
			partInfosInQuorum[pidx] = *found
			continue
		}
		partInfosInQuorum[pidx] = ObjectPartInfo{
			Number: partNumbers[pidx],
			Error: InvalidPart{
				PartNumber: partNumbers[pidx],
			}.Error(),
		}
	}
	return partInfosInQuorum, nil
}

func objPartToPartErr(part ObjectPartInfo) error {

    // Simple OID format: numbers separated by dots (at least one dot)
    private static final Pattern OID_PATTERN = Pattern.compile("\\d+(?:\\.\\d+)+");

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constant values match expected OIDs")
    void constantValues() {
        assertEquals("1.3.6.1.5.5.2", SpnegoConstants.SPNEGO_MECHANISM, "SPNEGO_MECHANISM mismatch");

certificates](https://docs.min.io/community/minio-object-store/operations/network-encryption.html).

For a [distributed MinIO setup](https://docs.min.io/community/minio-object-store/operations/deployments/kubernetes.html), where there are multiple pods with different domain names expected to run, you will either need wildcard certificates valid for all the domains or have specific certificates for each domain. If you are going to use specific certificates, make sure to create Kubernetes secrets accordingly....