// and 0 will be returned if nobody is subscribed for the type(s).
func (ps *PubSub[T, M]) NumSubscribers(mask M) int32 {
	types := Mask(atomic.LoadUint64(&ps.types))
	if !types.Overlaps(Mask(mask.Mask())) {
		return 0
	}
	return atomic.LoadInt32(&ps.numSubscribers)
}

// Subscribers returns the number of current subscribers for all types.
func (ps *PubSub[T, M]) Subscribers() int32 {

   * in a {@code RuntimeException}. <b>Note:</b> Be sure to declare all of the checked exception
   * types your try block can throw when calling an overload of this method so as to avoid losing
   * the original exception type.
   *
   * <p>This method always throws, and as such should be called as {@code throw closer.rethrow(e);}

    // ambiguous without the cast to Object because the boxed predicate prevents any overload from
    // being selected in phase 1
    checkState(boxedBoolean, "", (Object) boxedLong);

    // ternaries introduce their own problems. because of the ternary (which requires a boxing
    // operation) no overload can be selected in phase 1.  and in phase 2 it is ambiguous since it

  }

  static void clearInterrupt() {
    Thread.interrupted();
  }

  /**
   * Retrieves the result of a {@code Future} known to be done but uses the {@code get(long,
   * TimeUnit)} overload in order to test that method.
   */
  static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDoneFromTimeoutOverload(Future<V> future)
      throws ExecutionException {

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Microbenchmark for {@link Splitter#on} with char vs String with length == 1.
 *
 * @author Paul Lindner
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class SplitterBenchmark {
  // overall size of string
  @Param({"1", "10", "100", "1000"})
  int length;

  // Number of matching strings
  @Param({"xxxx", "xxXx", "xXxX", "XXXX"})
  String text;

  private String input;

* Missing null checks may cause NullPointerException
* Bridging with Kotlin code is polluted with platform types
* Some public APIs have incorrect nullability annotations (both overly restrictive and overly permissive)

While there are competing ways to represent absence (`Optional`, "Null Object" pattern, method overloads),
it is unlikely that we'll be able to remove `null` entirely.

  }

  static void clearInterrupt() {
    Thread.interrupted();
  }

  /**
   * Retrieves the result of a {@code Future} known to be done but uses the {@code get(long,
   * TimeUnit)} overload in order to test that method.
   */
  static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDoneFromTimeoutOverload(Future<V> future)
      throws ExecutionException {

	return rs.ReplicaStatus == o.ReplicaStatus &&
		rs.ReplicationStatusInternal == o.ReplicationStatusInternal &&
		rs.VersionPurgeStatusInternal == o.VersionPurgeStatusInternal
}

// CompositeReplicationStatus returns overall replication status for the object version being replicated.
func (rs *ReplicationState) CompositeReplicationStatus() (st replication.StatusType) {
	switch {
	case rs.ReplicationStatusInternal != "":

    assertTrue(set instanceof SingletonImmutableSet);
    assertEquals(Lists.newArrayList("a"), new ArrayList<>(set));
  }

  public void testCreation_oneDuplicate() {
    // now we'll get the varargs overload
    @SuppressWarnings("DistinctVarargsChecker") // deliberately testing deduplication
    ImmutableSet<String> set =
        ImmutableSet.of("a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "a");

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@link FakeTicker}.
 *
 * @author Jige Yu
 */
@GwtCompatible
// We also want to test the TimeUnit overload (especially under GWT, where it's the only option).
@SuppressWarnings("SetAutoIncrementStep_Nanos")
@NullUnmarked
public class FakeTickerTest extends TestCase {

  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester