int i = 0;
    for (Object e : elements) {
      array[i++] = (UnhashableObject) e;
    }
    return create(array);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a new collection containing the given elements; implement this method instead of {@link
   * #create(Object...)}.
   */
  protected abstract T create(UnhashableObject[] elements);

  @Override
  public UnhashableObject[] createArray(int length) {

- The steps required to fix the vulnerability.

In general, if the vulnerability exists in one of the MinIO code bases
itself - not in a code dependency - then MinIO will, if possible, fix
the vulnerability or implement reasonable countermeasures such that the

 * {@link CrawlerContainer}. It also provides a convenient method for
 * registering the extractor with the {@link ExtractorFactory}.
 * </p>
 *
 * <p>
 * Subclasses should implement the actual extraction logic in their own
 * methods, leveraging the helper methods provided by this abstract class.
 * </p>
 *
 */
public abstract class AbstractExtractor implements Extractor {

 * </pre>
 */
public abstract class AbstractUpgradeStrategy implements UpgradeStrategy {

    /**
     * Template method that handles common logging and error handling.
     * Subclasses implement the actual upgrade logic in doApply().
     */
    @Override
    public final UpgradeResult apply(UpgradeContext context, Map<Path, Document> pomMap) {
        context.info(getDescription());
        context.indent();

 *         .putUnencodedChars(person.getLastName())
 *         .putInt(person.getAge());
 *   }
 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @since 11.0
 */
@Beta
@DoNotMock("Implement with a lambda")
public interface Funnel<T extends @Nullable Object> extends Serializable {

  /**
   * Sends a stream of data from the {@code from} object into the sink {@code into}. There is no

<!--- If suggesting a change/improvement, explain the difference from current behavior -->

## Possible Solution
<!--- Not obligatory, but suggest a fix/reason for the bug, -->
<!--- or ideas how to implement the addition or change -->

## Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
<!--- Provide a link to a live example, or an unambiguous set of steps to -->
<!--- reproduce this bug. Include code to reproduce, if relevant -->

 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link
 * IteratorTester#newTargetIterator()} method. This is because it's impossible to test an Iterator
 * without changing its state, so the tester needs a steady supply of fresh Iterators.
 *

 * instance for non-daemon threads.
 *
 * The task runner is also responsible for releasing held threads when the library is unloaded.
 * This is for the benefit of container environments that implement code unloading.
 *
 * Most applications should share a process-wide [TaskRunner] and use queues for per-client work.
 */
class TaskRunner(
  val backend: Backend,
  internal val logger: Logger = TaskRunner.logger,

 *       the {@code Converter} type using a mocking framework.
 *   <li>Pass two lambda expressions or method references to the {@link #from from} factory method.
 *   <li>Extend this class and implement its {@link #doForward} and {@link #doBackward} methods.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Using a converter:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Convert one instance in the "forward" direction using {@code converter.convert(a)}.

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

/**
 * Any object which can accept registrations of {@link TearDown} instances.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @since 10.0
 */
@DoNotMock("Implement with a lambda")
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public interface TearDownAccepter {
  /**
   * Registers a TearDown implementor which will be run after the test proper.
   *