* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

          * I already hit the "watch" button in this repository to receive notifications and I commit to help at least 2 people that ask questions in the future.
          * Review one Pull Request by downloading the code and following [all the review process](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/help-fastapi/#review-pull-requests).

      options:
        - label: I commit to help with one of those options 👆
          required: true
  - type: textarea
    id: example

**Please provide a description of this PR:**



**To help us figure out who should review this PR, please put an X in all the areas that this PR affects.**

- [ ] Ambient
- [ ] Configuration Infrastructure
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Dual Stack
- [ ] Installation
- [ ] Networking
- [ ] Performance and Scalability
- [ ] Extensions and Telemetry
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Test and Release
- [ ] User Experience
- [ ] Developer Infrastructure

      env:
        TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        CONFIG: >
          {
            "approved-1":
              {
                "number": 1,
                "await_label": "awaiting-review"
              }

* Suggest a new **feature**.

**Note**: if you do it, then I'm going to ask you to also help others. 😉

## Review Pull Requests

You can help me review pull requests from others.

Again, please try your best to be kind. 🤗

---

Here's what to keep in mind and how to review a pull request:

### Understand the problem

   * navigable map is accomplished through the returned navigable map (or its views).
   *
   * <p>It is imperative that the user manually synchronize on the returned navigable map when
   * iterating over any of its collection views, or the collections views of any of its {@code
   * descendingMap}, {@code subMap}, {@code headMap} or {@code tailMap} views.
   *
   * <pre>{@code

   * navigable map is accomplished through the returned navigable map (or its views).
   *
   * <p>It is imperative that the user manually synchronize on the returned navigable map when
   * iterating over any of its collection views, or the collections views of any of its {@code
   * descendingMap}, {@code subMap}, {@code headMap} or {@code tailMap} views.
   *
   * <pre>{@code

        run: |
          go install mvdan.cc/gofumpt@v0.2.0
          gofumpt -e -d . | \

 * worse performance than data access by row key.
 *
 * <p>The methods returning collections or maps always return views of the underlying table.
 * Updating the table can change the contents of those collections, and updating the collections
 * will change the table.
 *
 * <p>All methods that modify the table are optional, and the views returned by the table may or may
 * not be modifiable. When modification isn't supported, those methods will throw an {@link

  }

  /**
   * Returns an immutable copy of the provided table.
   *
   * <p>The {@link Table#cellSet()} iteration order of the provided table determines the iteration
   * ordering of all views in the returned table. Note that some views of the original table and the
   * copied table may have different iteration orders. For more control over the ordering, create a