* elements, including {@code null}, are permitted.
 *
 * <p>{@code contains(x)}, {@code add(x)} and {@code remove(x)}, are all (expected and amortized)
 * constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash function doing a
 * good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far from uniform), and
 * amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *

 * remove) are supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far
 * from uniform), and amortized since some operations can trigger a hash table resize.
 *

            if (response != null) {
                response.clearReceived();
            }

            // try TreeConnectAndX with the request
            // this does not make any sense if we are disconnecting right now
            T chainedResponse = null;
            if (!(request instanceof SmbComTreeDisconnect) && !(request instanceof Smb2TreeDisconnectRequest)) {

   * This implements a "bursty" RateLimiter, where storedPermits are translated to zero throttling.
   * The maximum number of permits that can be saved (when the RateLimiter is unused) is defined in
   * terms of time, in this sense: if a RateLimiter is 2qps, and this time is specified as 10
   * seconds, we can save up to 2 * 10 = 20 permits.
   */
  static final class SmoothBursty extends SmoothRateLimiter {

                throws CIFSException {
            super(th, parent, wildcard, filter, searchAttributes);
        }

        TestIterator throwOnOpen() {
            // This method doesn't make sense anymore with static approach
            return this;
        }

        TestIterator throwOnFetch() {
            this.throwOnFetch = true;
            return this;
        }

         * don't _want_ our new TypeVariable to be equal to the JDK TypeVariable because it has
         * _different bounds_ than the JDK TypeVariable. And it wouldn't make sense for our new
         * TypeVariable to be equal to any _other_ JDK TypeVariable, either, because any other JDK
         * TypeVariable must have a different declaration or name. The only TypeVariable that our

 * Second, it is always backed by an array large enough to hold a value for every possible
 * combination of row and column keys. (This is rarely optimal unless the table is extremely dense.)
 * Finally, every possible combination of row and column keys is always considered to have a value
 * associated with it: It is not possible to "remove" a value, only to replace it with {@code null},

- Promoted JobSuccessPolicy E2E to Conformance ([#130658](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130658), [@tenzen-y](https://github.com/tenzen-y)) [SIG API Machinery, Apps, Architecture and Testing]

 * Stats}, {@link PairedStatsAccumulator}, and {@link PairedStats}.
 *
 * @author Pete Gillin
 */
@NullUnmarked
class StatsTesting {
  // TODO(cpovirk): Convince myself that this larger error makes sense.
  static final double ALLOWED_ERROR = isAndroid() ? .25 : 1e-10;

  // Inputs and their statistics:

  static final double ONE_VALUE = 12.34;

  static final double OTHER_ONE_VALUE = -56.78;

       * more information, see the comments in that class.
       *
       * We already know that that's how it behaves, and subclasses of Converter can't change that
       * behavior. So there's no sense in making all subclass authors exclude the method from any
       * NullPointerTester tests that they have.
       */
      ignoredMembers.add(Converter.class.getMethod("apply", Object.class));