* timeoutFuture can be set (and delegate cancelled) only once. (And "set only once" is
       * important for other reasons: run() can still be invoked concurrently in different threads,
       * even with the above null checks.)
       */
      timeoutFutureRef = null;
      if (delegate.isDone()) {
        timeoutFuture.setFuture(delegate);
      } else {
        try {

  }

  /**
   * This test creates a long random sequence of inputs, then a lot of differently configured sinks
   * process it; all should produce the same answer, the only difference should be the number of
   * process()/processRemaining() invocations, due to alignment.
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible // slow. TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.

        Subject shared = new Subject();
        Kerb5Authenticator d1 = new Kerb5Authenticator(shared);
        Kerb5Authenticator d2 = new Kerb5Authenticator(shared);
        assertEquals(d1, d2);

        // Different type -> false
        assertFalse(a.equals("not-an-auth"));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("isAnonymous: depends on subject presence and super")
    void isAnonymous_behaviour() {

		left -= int64(n)
		if left < shardSize {
			shardSize = left
		}

		read, err := io.CopyBuffer(h, io.LimitReader(r, shardSize), *bufp)
		if err != nil {
			// Read's failed for object with right size, at different offsets.
			return errFileCorrupt
		}

		left -= read
		if !bytes.Equal(h.Sum(nil), hashBuf[:n]) {
			return errFileCorrupt
		}
	}
	return nil
}

		if nv, ok := namedMap[string(name)]; ok {
			builder.AddVar(builder, nv)
		} else {
			builder.WriteByte('@')
			builder.WriteString(string(name))
		}
	}
}

// processValue handles different value types appropriately for SQL parameter binding
// It checks for driver.Valuer first, then handles slices/arrays, and finally adds single values
func processValue(builder Builder, value interface{}) {

        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address
        the real use case, or whether or not a different abstraction might be more appropriate.


        It's okay if you can't provide complete context on a use case. We understand if you are not
        able to discuss the full details of what you're working on.

                        </repository>
                    </repositories>
                </project>
                """);

            // Create child2 with different repository
            Path child2Dir = tempDir.resolve("child2");
            Files.createDirectories(child2Dir);
            Path child2Pom = child2Dir.resolve("pom.xml");
            Files.writeString(child2Pom, """

}

/**
 * If [mapping] qualifies to be encoded as [MappedRange.InlineDelta] return new instance, otherwise null.
 * An [MappedRange.InlineDelta] must be a mapping from a single code-point to a single code-point with a difference
 * that can be represented in 2^18-1.
 */
internal fun inlineDeltaOrNull(mapping: Mapping): MappedRange.InlineDelta? {
  if (mapping.hasSingleSourceCodePoint) {
    val sourceCodePoint = mapping.sourceCodePoint0

    private static final Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(QueryProcessor.class);

    /**
     * Map of query commands indexed by query class simple names.
     * Used to lookup appropriate command handlers for different query types.
     */
    protected Map<String, QueryCommand> queryCommandMap = new HashMap<>();

    /**
     * List of filters that will be applied during query processing.

                assertEquals("image/jpeg", mimeMap.getMimeType("jpg"));
            }
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle rapid succession of different extensions")
        void testRapidDifferentExtensions() throws IOException {
            String[] extensions = { "pdf", "doc", "xls", "html", "jpg", "gif", "png", "txt", "xml", "css" };