}

    private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /*
   * This is somewhat of a weak test; we verify that all of the methods are
   * correct, but not that they're actually forwarding correctly. We also rely
   * on the other tests (e.g., SynchronizedSetTest) to verify that the
   * collection views are synchronized correctly.
   */

  public void testSize() {

public abstract class ForwardingSortedMap<K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends ForwardingMap<K, V> implements SortedMap<K, V> {
  // TODO(lowasser): identify places where thread safety is actually lost

  /** Constructor for use by subclasses. */
  protected ForwardingSortedMap() {}

  @Override
  protected abstract SortedMap<K, V> delegate();

  @Override

Have a simple and easy to use routing system.

///

### [Requests](https://requests.readthedocs.io) { #requests }

**FastAPI** is not actually an alternative to **Requests**. Their scope is very different.

It would actually be common to use Requests *inside* of a FastAPI application.

But still, FastAPI got quite some inspiration from Requests.

### [Routes](https://square.github.io/okhttp/5.x/okhttp/okhttp3/-route/)

import java.util.Map.Entry;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Base class for map testers.
 *
 * <p>TODO: see how much of this is actually needed once Map testers are written. (It was cloned
 * from AbstractCollectionTester.)
 *
 * @param <K> the key type of the map to be tested.
 * @param <V> the value type of the map to be tested.

And in many cases, reading them would be a blocking operation (that could block the event loop), because they are read from disk or from the network.

/// info

The example above is actually an exception, because the `io.BytesIO` object is already in memory, so reading it won't block anything.

But in many cases reading a file or a file-like object would block.

///

      // call to addListener() will callback to setOneValue(), transitively call our cleanup
      // listener, and set this.futures to null.
      // This is not actually a problem, since the foreach only needs this.futures to be non-null
      // at the beginning of the loop.
      int i = 0;
      for (ListenableFuture<? extends InputT> future : futures) {
        int index = i++;

errors.crud_could_not_find_crud_table = Les données {0} sont introuvables.
errors.could_not_find_backup_index=Impossible de trouver un index de sauvegarde.
errors.no_user_for_changing_password=Le mot de passe actuel n'est pas correct.
errors.failed_to_change_password=Échec de la modification de votre mot de passe.
errors.unknown_version_for_upgrade=Version inconnue pour la mise à niveau.

It will include all the routes from that router as part of it.

/// note | Technical Details

It will actually internally create a *path operation* for each *path operation* that was declared in the `APIRouter`.

So, behind the scenes, it will actually work as if everything was the same single app.

///

/// check

You don't have to worry about performance when including routers.

 * </pre>
 *
 * the access check would fail because the direct ACE has an access mask
 * of <code>0x001200A9</code> which doesn't have the
 * <code>FILE_WRITE_DATA</code> bit on (bit <code>0x00000002</code>). Actually, this isn't quite correct. If
 * <code>WNET\alice</code> is in the local <code>Administrators</code> group the access check
 * will succeed because the inherited ACE allows local <code>Administrators</code>