.url(server.url("/"))
        .post(data.toRequestBody("text/plain".toMediaType()))
        .build()
    val call = client.newCall(request1)
    assertFailsWith<SocketTimeoutException> {
      call.execute() // we want this call to throw a SocketTimeoutException
    }
  }

  @Test
  fun chainCanCancelCall() {
    val callRef = AtomicReference<Call>()
    val interceptor =
      Interceptor { chain: Interceptor.Chain ->

   * a good policy, especially because, in order for the test to pass, the
   * parameter must be misleadingly annotated as @Nullable. I suspect that
   * we'll want to remove @Nullable, add an eager checkNotNull, and loosen up
   * testRemove_nullAllowed.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Override
  public int remove(@Nullable Object element, int occurrences) {

   * will silently add the missing nodes to the graph, then add the edge connecting them. We are not
   * using the proxy methods here as we want to test {@code addEdge} when the end-points are not
   * elements of the graph.
   */
  @Test
  public void addEdge_nodesNotInGraph() {
    assume().that(graphIsMutable()).isTrue();

         */
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        E targetReturnValueFromNext = (E) targetReturnValue;
        /*
         * We have an Iterator<E> and want to cast it to MultiExceptionListIterator. Because we're
         * inside an AbstractIteratorTester<E>, that's implicitly a cast to
         * AbstractIteratorTester<E>.MultiExceptionListIterator. The runtime won't be able to verify

   * 1. b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations.
   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would

| *Valid Range* | *Minimum value of 900. Maximum value of 31536000.* |
| *Required*    | *No*                                               |

### Policy

     * resolution, this does not include the download of the files for the dependency artifacts. It is meant for mojos
     * that only want to analyze the set of transitive dependencies, in particular during early lifecycle phases where
     * full dependency resolution might fail due to projects which haven't been built yet.
     *

   * WORD_TO_INT.entrySet()} is guaranteed to iterate over the entries in the order {@code "one"=1,
   * "two"=2, "three"=3}, and {@code keySet()} and {@code values()} respect the same order. If you
   * want a different order, consider using {@link #orderEntriesByValue(Comparator)}, which changes
   * this builder to sort entries by value.
   *

   * 1. b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations.
   *
   * 2. `other[size] = null` is unsound. We could "fix" this by requiring callers to pass in an
   * array with a nullable element type. But probably they usually want an array with a non-nullable
   * type. That said, we could *accept* a `@Nullable T[]` (which, given that we treat arrays as
   * covariant, would still permit a plain `T[]`) and return a plain `T[]`. But of course that would

    assertEquals(
        ImmutableSetMultimap.of('o', "of", 'f', "of", 't', "to", 'o', "to"),
        ImmutableSetMultimap.of("of", 'o', "of", 'f', "to", 't', "to", 'o').inverse());
  }

  // Yes, we want to test that inverse() returns the same instance each time that it's called.
  @SuppressWarnings("SelfAssertion")
  public void testInverseMinimizesWork() {
    ImmutableSetMultimap<String, Character> multimap =