// Second listing should use cache (much faster)
    long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
    SmbFile[] files2 = dir.listFiles();
    long time2 = System.currentTimeMillis() - start2;
    
    assertEquals(files1.length, files2.length);
    assertTrue(time2 < time1 / 2);  // Should be significantly faster
}

@Test
public void testDirectoryChangeNotification() throws Exception {

    assertEquals(1, numCalls.get());
  }

  /*
   * Under Android, MyError propagates up and fails the test?
   *
   * TODO(b/218700094): Does this matter to prod users, or is it just a feature of our testing
   * environment? If the latter, maybe write a custom Executor that avoids failing the test when it
   * sees an Error?
   */
  @AndroidIncompatible
  public void testTaskThrowsError() throws Exception {

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A wrapper class for unsigned {@code long} values, supporting arithmetic operations.
 *
 * <p>In some cases, when speed is more important than code readability, it may be faster simply to
 * treat primitive {@code long} values as unsigned, using the methods from {@link UnsignedLongs}.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a

   * at least for commonly used charsets like UTF-8.
   */

  @Override
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public final Hasher putByte(byte b) {
    buffer.put(b);
    munchIfFull();
    return this;
  }

  @Override
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public final Hasher putShort(short s) {
    buffer.putShort(s);
    munchIfFull();

   *
   * <p>Since Strings are immutable and built into the jdk we can optimize some operations
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>use {@link StringReader} instead of {@link CharSequenceReader}. It is faster since it can
   *       use {@link String#getChars(int, int, char[], int)} instead of copying characters one by
   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Chars.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(char[] array, int distance) {

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {

   *
   * <p>Since Strings are immutable and built into the jdk we can optimize some operations
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>use {@link StringReader} instead of {@link CharSequenceReader}. It is faster since it can
   *       use {@link String#getChars(int, int, char[], int)} instead of copying characters one by
   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Shorts.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(short[] array, int distance) {

        // Test with zero length buffer
        buffer.putShort(0, (short) 0);
        buffer.putShort(2, (short) 0);
        buffer.putInt(4, 8); // Offset doesn't matter for zero length
        result = NtlmMessage.readSecurityBuffer(data, 0);
        assertEquals(0, result.length, "Should return empty array for zero length buffer.");