return nil, err
	}

	if err = syscall.FcntlFlock(f.Fd(), rlockType, &lock); err != nil {
		f.Close()
		if err == syscall.EAGAIN {
			err = ErrAlreadyLocked
		}
		return nil, err
	}

	st, err := os.Stat(path)
	if err != nil {
		f.Close()
		return nil, err
	}

	if st.IsDir() {
		f.Close()
		return nil, &os.PathError{
			Op:   "open",
			Path: path,
			Err:  syscall.EISDIR,
		}
	}

  interface ConcurrentlyMutatedList<E> extends List<E> {
    /**
     * The elements of a {@link ConcurrentlyMutatedList} are added and removed over time. This
     * method returns every state that the list has passed through at some point.
     */
    Set<List<E>> getAllStates();
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@link ConcurrentlyMutatedList} that performs the given operations as its concurrent

   * first decrementing to zero, and then removing. putIfAbsent or replace could observe the
   * intermediate zero-state. Ways we could deal with this are:
   *
   * - Don't define any of the ConcurrentMap operations. This is the current state of affairs.
   *
   * - Define putIfAbsent and replace as treating zero and absent identically (as currently

     */
    public String createdTime;

    /**
     * Version number of the role type.
     */
    public String versionNo;

    /**
     * Clears the pager's state.
     */
    public void clear() {
        allRecordCount = 0;
        allPageCount = 0;
        existPrePage = false;
        existNextPage = false;
        pageSize = getDefaultPageSize();

            doColumn("roles");
        }

        public void columnRoomNumber() {
            doColumn("roomNumber");
        }

        public void columnState() {
            doColumn("state");
        }

        public void columnStreet() {
            doColumn("street");
        }

        public void columnSurname() {
            doColumn("surname");
        }

    private final List<WitnessIPAddress> oldIPAddresses;
    private String clientAccessPoint;
    private int flags;
    private String newNodeAddress;

    // Notification flags
    /** Resource state is unknown */
    public static final int WITNESS_RESOURCE_STATE_UNKNOWN = 0x00000000;
    /** Resource is available for use */
    public static final int WITNESS_RESOURCE_STATE_AVAILABLE = 0x00000001;

            @Nullable Throwable error) {}

    /**
     * If this is an accumulating log, it will "drain" this instance. It returns the accumulated log entries, and
     * also "resets" this instance to empty (initial) state.
     */
    @Nonnull
    default List<Entry> drain() {
        return List.of();
    }

    /*
      At the moment, this class is totally immutable, and this is in line with thoughts about the
      pre-calculated execution plan that stays the same during the execution.

      If deciding to add mutable state to this class, it should be at least considered to
      separate this into a separate mutable structure.

    */

    private final List<ExecutionPlanItem> planItem;

              return socket
            }
          },
        ).build()
  }

  @AfterEach
  fun tearDown() {
    Thread.interrupted() // Clear interrupted state.
  }

  @Test
  fun interruptWritingRequestBody() {
    server.enqueue(MockResponse())
    server.start()
    val call =
      client.newCall(
        Request
          .Builder()

    public void testConstructorWithMessageAndCause() {
        // Create exception with both message and cause
        String message = "Transport error occurred";
        IllegalStateException rootCause = new IllegalStateException("State error");
        TransportException exception = new TransportException(message, rootCause);

        // Verify both message and cause are set correctly
        assertNotNull(exception);