boolean found = activeResources.stream().anyMatch(desc -> desc.contains("TestResource"));
        assertTrue(found);
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test multiple close calls on managed resource")
    void testMultipleCloseOnManagedResource() throws Exception {
        TestResource resource = new TestResource("multiclose");

    public OptionalEntity<DataConfig> getDataConfig(final String id) {
        return dataConfigBhv.selectByPK(id);
    }

    /**
     * Retrieves a data configuration by its name.
     *
     * <p>If multiple configurations exist with the same name, returns the first one
     * ordered by sort order ascending.</p>
     *
     * @param name the name of the data configuration to retrieve

        assertEquals("anotherComponent", exception3.getComponentName());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_exceptionChaining() {
        // Test exception chaining with multiple levels
        Exception rootCause = new Exception("Root cause");
        RuntimeException middleCause = new RuntimeException("Middle cause", rootCause);

   * Creates a table with the specified data.
   *
   * @param data the table data, repeating the sequence row key, column key, value once per mapping
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the size of {@code data} isn't a multiple of 3
   * @throws ClassCastException if a data element has the wrong type
   */
  protected abstract Table<String, Integer, C> create(@Nullable Object... data);

  protected void assertSize(int expectedSize) {

        assertEquals(testWindowSize, queryRescorerBuilder.windowSize().intValue());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_evaluate_multipleCallsWithDifferentConfigs() {
        // Test multiple calls with different configurations
        Map<String, Object> params = new HashMap<>();
        params.put("param", "value");

        // First call with model name

*   Fixes multiple `CHECK`-failures during Grappler's `IsSimplifiableReshape`
    ([CVE-2022-23581](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-23581))
*   Fixes multiple `CHECK`-failures during Grappler's `SafeToRemoveIdentity`
    ([CVE-2022-23579](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-23579))
*   Fixes multiple `CHECK`-failures in `TensorByteSize`

  fun malformedBase64() {
    val builder = CertificatePinner.Builder()
    assertFailsWith<IllegalArgumentException> {
      builder.add("example.com", "sha1/DmxUShsZuNiqPQsX2Oi9uv2sCnw*")
    }
  }

  /** Multiple certificates generated from the same keypair have the same pin.  */
  @Test
  fun sameKeypairSamePin() {
    val heldCertificateA2 =
      HeldCertificate
        .Builder()
        .keyPair(certA1.keyPair)

	case conf.AccountName == "":
		return errors.New("the account name is required")
	case conf.AccountKey != "" && (conf.SPAuth.TenantID != "" || conf.SPAuth.ClientID != "" || conf.SPAuth.ClientSecret != ""):
		return errors.New("multiple authentication mechanisms are provided")
	case conf.AccountKey == "" && (conf.SPAuth.TenantID == "" || conf.SPAuth.ClientID == "" || conf.SPAuth.ClientSecret == ""):
		return errors.New("no authentication mechanism was provided")

    /**
     * A helper method to determine the value to resume the build with {@code -rf} taking into account the edge case
     *   where multiple modules in the reactor have the same artifactId.
     * <p>
     * {@code -rf :artifactId} will pick up the first module which matches, but when multiple modules in the reactor
     *   have the same artifactId, effective failed module might be later in build reactor.

        assertTrue(result.contains("Illegal state in search log processing"));
        assertTrue(result.endsWith("\n"));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_execute_multipleErrors() {
        // Test with multiple calls to execute() with errors
        SearchLogHelper mockSearchLogHelper = new SearchLogHelper() {
            private int callCount = 0;

            @Override
            public void storeSearchLog() {