// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
// along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

package cmd

import (
	"context"
	"fmt"
	"runtime"
	"strconv"
	"time"

// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
// along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

package cmd

import (
	"context"
	"errors"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"strings"

          /*
           * requireNonNull is safe because we ensure that the first `distinct` elements have been
           * populated.
           */
          return of(requireNonNull(dedupedElements[0]));
        default:
          /*
           * The suppression is safe because we ensure that the first `distinct` elements have been
           * populated.
           */
          @SuppressWarnings("nullness")

    }
  }

  override fun loadForRequest(url: HttpUrl): List<Cookie> {
    val cookieHeaders =
      try {
        // The RI passes all headers. We don't have 'em, so we don't pass 'em!
        cookieHandler.get(url.toUri(), emptyMap<String, List<String>>())
      } catch (e: IOException) {
        Platform.get().log("Loading cookies failed for " + url.resolve("/...")!!, WARN, e)

  }

  private void assertBad(String spec) {
    try {
      HostSpecifier.fromValid(spec);
      fail("Should have thrown IllegalArgumentException: " + spec);
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
    }

    try {
      HostSpecifier.from(spec);
      fail("Should have thrown ParseException: " + spec);
    } catch (ParseException expected) {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *