## Changes since v1.1.1

### Major Themes

  * <strong>Significant scale improvements</strong>. Increased cluster scale by 400% to 1000 nodes with 30,000 pods per cluster.
Kubelet supports 100 pods per node with 4x reduced system overhead.
  * <strong>Simplified application deployment and management. </strong>

 * creation time, the queue is unbounded.
 *
 * <p>Usage example:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * MinMaxPriorityQueue<User> users = MinMaxPriorityQueue.orderedBy(userComparator)
 *     .maximumSize(1000)
 *     .create();
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>As a {@link Queue} it functions exactly as a {@link PriorityQueue}: its head element -- the
 * implicit target of the methods {@link #peek()}, {@link #poll()} and {@link #remove()} -- is

    public void test_getTika_zip_bom() {
        final InputStream in = ResourceUtil.getResourceAsStream("extractor/zip/test_size.zip");
        tikaExtractor.maxCompressionRatio = 1;
        tikaExtractor.maxUncompressionSize = 10000;
        try {
            tikaExtractor.getText(in, null);
            fail();
        } catch (final ExtractException e) {
            logger.info(e.getMessage());
        }
    }

 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be

 * }
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <p>It is important to note that the number of permits requested <i>never</i> affects the
 * throttling of the request itself (an invocation to {@code acquire(1)} and an invocation to {@code
 * acquire(1000)} will result in exactly the same throttling, if any), but it affects the throttling
 * of the <i>next</i> request. I.e., if an expensive task arrives at an idle RateLimiter, it will be

 * cache instances created by {@code CacheBuilder} will not perform any type of eviction.
 *
 * <p>Usage example:
 *
 * <pre>{@code
 * LoadingCache<Key, Graph> graphs = CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
 *     .maximumSize(10000)
 *     .expireAfterWrite(Duration.ofMinutes(10))
 *     .removalListener(MY_LISTENER)
 *     .build(
 *         new CacheLoader<Key, Graph>() {
 *           public Graph load(Key key) throws AnyException {

)

const (
	// a heal sequence with this many un-consumed heal result
	// items blocks until heal-status consumption resumes or is
	// aborted due to timeout.
	maxUnconsumedHealResultItems = 1000

	// if no heal-results are consumed (via the heal-status API)
	// for this timeout duration, the heal sequence is aborted.
	healUnconsumedTimeout = 24 * time.Hour

	// time-duration to keep heal sequence state after it

		Remote:             o.remote,
		Local:              o.local,
		id:                 o.id,
		ctx:                o.ctx,
		outgoing:           xsync.NewMapOfPresized[uint64, *muxClient](1000),
		inStream:           xsync.NewMapOfPresized[uint64, *muxServer](1000),
		outQueue:           make(chan []byte, defaultOutQueue),
		side:               ws.StateServerSide,
		connChange:         &sync.Cond{L: &sync.Mutex{}},
		handlers:           o.handlers,

  }

  public void testByteArrayRoundTrips() {
    Random r = new Random(5);
    byte[] b = new byte[Ints.BYTES];

    // total overkill, but, it takes 0.1 sec so why not...
    for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
      int num = r.nextInt();
      assertThat(Ints.fromByteArray(Ints.toByteArray(num))).isEqualTo(num);

      r.nextBytes(b);
      assertThat(Ints.toByteArray(Ints.fromByteArray(b))).isEqualTo(b);
    }

      },
      "content_length_filter": {
        "type": "length",
        "max": 30
      },
      "limit_token_count_filter": {
        "type": "limit",
        "max_token_count": 10000
      },
      "stemmer_en_filter": {
        "type": "stemmer",
        "name": "possessive_english"
      },
      "arabic_stop": {
        "type":       "stop",
        "stopwords":  "_arabic_"