try {
            /* We cannot synchronize (run_thread) here or the caller's
             * thread.wait( timeout ) cannot reaquire the lock and
             * return which would render the timeout effectively useless.
             */
            doConnect();
        } catch (final Exception ex) {
            ex0 = ex; // Defer to below where we're locked
            return;
        } finally {

            /*
             * We cannot synchronize (run_thread) here or the caller's
             * thread.wait( timeout ) cannot reaquire the lock and
             * return which would render the timeout effectively useless.
             */
            if (this.state != 5 && this.state != 6) {
                doConnect();
            }
        } catch (final Exception ex) {
            ex0 = ex; // Defer to below where we're locked

            assertTrue(ACE.GENERIC_ALL < ACE.GENERIC_EXECUTE, "GENERIC_ALL should be less than GENERIC_EXECUTE");
            assertTrue(ACE.GENERIC_EXECUTE < ACE.GENERIC_WRITE, "GENERIC_EXECUTE should be less than GENERIC_WRITE");
            // Note: GENERIC_READ (0x80000000) is negative, so it's less than positive values in signed comparison

constraints.AssertTrue.message = {item} must be true.
constraints.DecimalMax.message = {item} must be less than {value}.
constraints.DecimalMin.message = {item} must be greater than {value}.
constraints.Digits.message = {item} must be a number. (expected: <number>.<number>)
constraints.Future.message = {item} must be a future value.
constraints.Max.message = {item} must be less than or equal to {value}.

constraints.AssertTrue.message = {item} must be true.
constraints.DecimalMax.message = {item} must be less than {value}.
constraints.DecimalMin.message = {item} must be greater than {value}.
constraints.Digits.message = {item} must be a number. (expected: <number>.<number>)
constraints.Future.message = {item} must be a future value.
constraints.Max.message = {item} must be less than or equal to {value}.

* **Intuitive**: Great editor support. <abbr title="also known as auto-complete, autocompletion, IntelliSense">Completion</abbr> everywhere. Less time debugging.
* **Easy**: Designed to be easy to use and learn. Less time reading docs.
* **Short**: Minimize code duplication. Multiple features from each parameter declaration. Fewer bugs.

* **Uvicorn**:
    * Will have the best performance, as it doesn't have much extra code apart from the server itself.
    * You wouldn't write an application in Uvicorn directly. That would mean that your code would have to include more or less, at least, all the code provided by Starlette (or **FastAPI**). And if you did that, your final application would have the same overhead as having used a framework and minimizing your app code and bugs.

But still, FastAPI got quite some inspiration from Requests.

**Requests** is a library to *interact* with APIs (as a client), while **FastAPI** is a library to *build* APIs (as a server).

They are, more or less, at opposite ends, complementing each other.

Requests has a very simple and intuitive design, it's very easy to use, with sensible defaults. But at the same time, it's very powerful and customizable.

            assertEquals(expected, actual, "createDisposition should match");
        }
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("CreateOptions default padding")
    void createOptionsAddedWhenLow() {
        // createOptions less than 0x0001 (i.e., 0) should be padded with 0x0040
        SmbComNTCreateAndX req = createRequest(0, 0);
        int actual = (int) getPrivateField(req, "createOptions");

    void writeBytesWireFormat_throwsIfInsufficientSpace() {
        // Arrange
        Smb2LogoffRequest req = newRequest();
        byte[] tiny = new byte[3]; // less than 4 bytes available

        // Act/Assert
        assertThrows(ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.class, () -> req.writeBytesWireFormat(tiny, 0));
    }

    @Test