* the behavior of {@link #addAll}, which can lead to unexpected behavior. In this case, you should
 * override {@code addAll} as well, either providing your own implementation, or delegating to the
 * provided {@code standardAddAll} method.
 *
 * <p><b>{@code default} method warning:</b> This class does <i>not</i> forward calls to {@code

import java.util.Set;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests the object generated
 * by a G, selecting appropriate tests by matching them against specified features.
 *

 *       in any other way than how {@code Stopwatch} uses them.
 *   <li>An alternative source of nanosecond ticks can be substituted, for example for testing or
 *       performance reasons, without affecting most of your code.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>The one downside of {@code Stopwatch} relative to {@link System#nanoTime()} is that {@code
 * Stopwatch} requires object allocation and additional method calls, which can reduce the accuracy

    repeatedlyInterruptTestThread(tearDownStack);
    latch.awaitUnsuccessfully(70);
    assertInterrupted();
  }

  // Condition.await() tests

  /*
   * RE: the WaitNotInLoop warnings:
   *
   * Our tests for awaitUninterruptibly are written under the assumption that no spurious wakeups
   * occur except for those produced by awaitUninterruptibly itself in response to interrupts.
   *

                 * the map to change between that call and this one. But if that happens, the
                 * behavior is undefined because of the concurrent mutation.)
                 *
                 * (Our prototype checker happens to be "smart" enough to understand this for the
                 * *get* call in getValue but not for the *put* call here.)
                 *

   * simply use the standard method-chaining idiom, as illustrated in the documentation at top,
   * configuring a {@code CacheBuilder} and building your {@link Cache} all in a single statement.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> if you ignore the above advice, and use this {@code CacheBuilder} to build a

        existingValue == null,
        "Duplicate key: (row=%s, column=%s), values: [%s, %s].",
        rowKey,
        columnKey,
        newValue,
        existingValue);
  }

  // redeclare to satisfy our test for b/310253115
  @Override
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible
    abstract Object writeReplace();

import java.util.Set;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests the object generated
 * by a G, selecting appropriate tests by matching them against specified features.
 *

import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.Map.Entry;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Creates, based on your criteria, a JUnit test suite that exhaustively tests a Map implementation.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
@GwtIncompatible
public class MapTestSuiteBuilder<K, V>
    extends PerCollectionSizeTestSuiteBuilder<

        // The real getDocumentCount returns -1 on error; our test double tracks this
        testClient.documentCountError = true;
        final long count = testClient.getDocumentCount("nonexistent_index");
        assertEquals(-1L, count);
    }

    @Test
    public void test_getAliasCount_returnsZeroOnError() {
        // The real getAliasCount returns 0 on error; our test double tracks this